Faster than speed of light possible ?

bigworld
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
good day ,

I am not a professional , but I read that in according to laws of physics it is not possible to go faster than speed of light . but I also read that after the big bang in just seconds the universe expanded from a size of an atom to the size of a galaxy . so obviously it expanded faster than speed of light to reach such expansion rates . how can physics describe this ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in case of the "big bang" the expansion did not involve matter but the spacetime itself...
 
bigworld said:
good day ,

I am not a professional , but I read that in according to laws of physics it is not possible to go faster than speed of light . but I also read that after the big bang in just seconds the universe expanded from a size of an atom to the size of a galaxy . so obviously it expanded faster than speed of light to reach such expansion rates . how can physics describe this ??
I'm also very much an amateur, but I think the most rapid part of the expansion, called Inflation, took place in far less than a few seconds but a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.

The key is that the normal universe maintains the maximum speed of light at c in a vacuum. But if the fabric of space, therefore the "room" in space, inflates, theoretically there may be an appearance of faster-than-light speeds having taken place.

We may find that we have added an epicycle to achieve cover for this phenomena, but I believe it is the best we have now. The theory is far from concrete, I think.

Here's an outside link, and I would encourage you to look for FAQs in the Cosmology section of this site.

Wes
...
 
Thats interesting .. thanks i will look at the link
 
We have a FAQ about this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=508610
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bcrowell said:
We have a FAQ about this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=508610
Thanks for the quick link, bcrowell.

I'm starting to learn to wisely look for FAQs here first, but my better half was literally dragging me out the door to a Supper when I answered, so I quick punted. Usually when in Rome, it pays to speak the same language and the FAQs are a real gift to make physics more clear to all concerned. So thanks for providing/contributing the onboard FAQ too.

Wes
...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top