Fermat's Theorem: A Math Problem and the Smart Boy Who Proved It Wrong

AI Thread Summary
A computer scientist claimed to have proven Fermat's Last Theorem for three specific numbers but was challenged by a 10-year-old boy who identified a mistake. The boy pointed out that the theorem cannot hold for those numbers, prompting the scientist to check his calculations and discover a bug in his computer program. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding modular arithmetic, as the boy noted the numbers' patterns in relation to modulo 5. The conversation revolves around the implications of these findings and the mathematical principles involved. Ultimately, the incident underscores the significance of critical thinking in mathematics.
uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
from: http://www.math.utah.edu/~cherk/puzzles.html
Fermat, computers, and a smart boy
A computer scientist claims that he proved somehow that the Fermat theorem is correct for the following 3 numbers:

x=2233445566,
y=7788990011,
z=9988776655

He announces these 3 numbers and calls for a press conference where he is going to present the value of N (to show that

x^N + y^N = z^N

and that the guy from Princeton was wrong). As the press conference starts, a 10-years old boy raises his hand and says that the respectable scientist has made a mistake and the Fermat theorem cannot hold for those 3 numbers. The scientist checks his computer calculations and finds a bug.

How did the boy figure out that the scientist was wrong?

I am stumped, I noticed the pattern in the digits of the numbers, but I do not see how I can link that to the possibility of forming such a statement with those numbers when n is greater than 2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x==1Mod 5, Y==1 Mod 5, Z==0 Mod 5.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top