Graduate Fermi-Dirac statistics, finding all electron configurations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Fermi-Dirac statistics and the determination of electron configurations in a system of 20 electrons with equidistant energy levels. It is established that there are exactly 24 possible configurations, which can be derived through systematic counting methods. Participants emphasize the importance of sorting configurations by energy levels and occupancy to facilitate the counting process. While some express concern about the lengthy nature of this method, it is clarified that computational tools can execute these calculations in milliseconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Knowledge of electron configurations
  • Familiarity with energy level sorting techniques
  • Basic computational skills for simulating configurations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research systematic counting methods for electron configurations
  • Explore computational tools for simulating Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Learn about energy level sorting algorithms
  • Investigate advanced methods for optimizing electron configuration calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as computational scientists interested in electron configuration analysis.

sigint00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm having trouble understanding this example: https://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch2_5.htm#2_5_2

In this system of 20 electrons with equidistant energy levels, how is it known that there are only 24 possible configurations, and how are those configurations found?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By counting. You can set up fancy sums, but ultimately it is just a matter of counting.
If you want a systematic approach, sort them by energy of the highest occupied level for example, then by occupancy of that level, then by energy of the second highest occupied level, ...
Alternatively sort by number of excited electrons.
 
mfb said:
By counting. You can set up fancy sums, but ultimately it is just a matter of counting.
If you want a systematic approach, sort them by energy of the highest occupied level for example, then by occupancy of that level, then by energy of the second highest occupied level, ...
Alternatively sort by number of excited electrons.

So there's no getting around this just being a long process of trial-and-error? or I'm misunderstanding, maybe...
 
24 states, it is not that long, and a computer does it in less than a millisecond.
I'm not aware of a method that is faster than counting the states, but that doesn't mean there can't be such a method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K