Ferromagnetism and Work done by a bar magnet.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between magnetic forces and electromagnetic fields in the context of ferromagnetism and work done by bar magnets. It clarifies that the electromotive force (emf) from a battery does not perform work against magnetic forces; rather, it works against electric fields to maintain current. When two magnets attract, their magnetic forces initially govern the interaction, but once they accelerate, electric forces take over to increase their kinetic energy. This transition involves a conversion of mutual magnetic energy into kinetic energy. The example from Griffith's textbook illustrates these principles effectively, particularly in relation to how dipole currents behave in magnetic fields.
siddharth5129
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
I was just doing a read-through of my freshman griffith's electrodynamics textbook ( I found my comprehension of electrodynamics slipping again ... always gets me edgy ) and I find my self flummoxed yet again. So he goes through an example of magnetic forces lifting a weight, and shows how it's actually the source of emf that's doing the work against magnetic forces to keep the weight moving upwards. This makes perfect sense. So I find that it would make sense when applied to say, two bar magnets attracting one another, if the magnetic forces somehow acted against the microscopic dipole currents and reduce their strength. If the magnet was reinforced with a electric coil, then the source emf would be doing the work against the magnetic forces, no problem there. But if it isn't, do the dipole currents reduce in strength ( in this case, alignment, seeing as the dipole moments that contribute to ferromagnetism are quantized ), as i am forced to conclude? Or am i missing something here? An iron magnet doesn't have an in built source of emf that does the work does it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On which page of Griffiths' book on electrodynamics is the example described? From you post it is not cleat what the situation looks like.
 
Section 5.1.3 of the text. Example 5.3, page 210 and 211. Thanks for your time.
 
emf of the battery does not do work against magnetic forces - those cannot give or accept work. The emf does work against electric field in the source (battery) to maintain voltage and electric field driving the current along the wire. If the current is strong enough, the magnetic force will accelerate the metal upwards. This acceleration goes with induced electric field of the source and the wire itself (due to current distribution changing its position in space) which acts back on the wire and does work against the gravity force. The gravitational potential energy comes from the energy of the battery.

In case of two magnets with solid magnetization, the attraction is due to magnetic forces, but as soon as the magnets are released and accelerate, electric forces kick in and do the work to increase kinetic energy of the magnets. This is at the expense of the original mutual magnetic energy of the magnets.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top