Feynman Diagram: Simga+ -> p + gamma?

Dr.Brule
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Feynman Diagram: Simga+ --> p + gamma?

Hi,

Can anyone give me some indications as to how to draw the feynman diagram for the following decay?

Ʃ+ → p + \gamma

Should I consider the quark composition of the sigma first?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Dr.Brule said:
Should I consider the quark composition of the sigma first?

Thanks a lot.

Indeed. All of the QED/QCD interactions involve individual quarks and leptons, not composite particles. So you want to consider what happens to each quark in the sigma particle independently (at least, to get a first approximation to the decay).
 


Steely Dan said:
Indeed. All of the QED/QCD interactions involve individual quarks and leptons, not composite particles. So you want to consider what happens to each quark in the sigma particle independently (at least, to get a first approximation to the decay).

So I get how the two u quarks would combine with a d quark to form the proton, but would you get this d quark with the s quark that's left?

Is the process s --> u + anti u ---> ONE gamma allowed?
 


Dr.Brule said:
So I get how the two u quarks would combine with a d quark to form the proton, but would you get this d quark with the s quark that's left?

Is the process s --> u + anti u ---> ONE gamma allowed?

No, that process does not conserve electric charge. What weak interaction processes involving quarks did you learn about?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top