Unraveling the Mysteries of Magnets and Field Lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of iron filings in a magnetic field, specifically how they form neat lines around a magnet despite the smooth nature of the magnetic force. It explains that while the inverse square law governs the field, the filings align according to the magnetic field lines for visualization. The filings create a layered pattern because the magnet induces a magnetic moment in them, leading to mutual attraction. This clumping effect results in the organized structure observed. The phenomenon illustrates the interaction between magnetic fields and ferromagnetic materials.
Arnan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I know that anything casting a field obeys the inverse square law and that field lines are an abstract used to help us visualise the vectors on objects effected by the field.

Why is it then that if I drop iron filings around a magnet they sort themselves into neat lines?
I would expect that to orient themselves according to the field but why separate into a layered pattern emmanating out from the source when the actual change in force is smooth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnet induces a magnetic moment in the iron fillings which attracts other iron fillings. The iron fillings tend to clump together so that you get a nice layered pattern.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top