Fields of One Fermion: Spin, Charge & Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marjan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion Field
Marjan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
One thing is bothering me from "the beginning".

Let's take one fermion. It has spin, charge and mass (of course).

This particle is surrounded with static magnetic field (becouse of it's spin), and with static electric field (becouse of it's charge).

Both field (separately) are represeneted as virtual photons in S.M. Well, for el. field we need another fermion close to this one, but that is not a problem.

So, what is the difference beetween those two kinds of photons? Spin?

And another question: Why do we need to accelerate this fermion that we get electromagnetic field?? What happens with those two kinds of virtual photons that we get real photons?
If those fields before were static, E.M. is dynamic (oscilation of those two fields...), right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you want is a field theory interpretation.. Ie one quantum field. Now, for the one fermion field, there is a very old and elegant solution to this, and its called the Dirac lagrangian. Its a free field theory, but it possesses all the things you know and love (charge, spin, etc etc). If you solve the equations of motion, you get the Dirac equation, from there in the nonrelativistic, hbar --> 0 case, you get Maxwells equations.

Upon quantizing this field, you get some of the things you are talking about, eg virtual photons (in essence they are perturbation series artifacts, and not necessarily physical depending on how you like to think of them).

Virtual photons, are identical to real photons, except that they live off mass shell.
 
Haelfix, congrats for 100 post on PF :)

I agree with you.
Well I say that virtual photons are the same as real, they just exist so short time that it is not possible to meassure them. Is this the same as your state "they live off mass shell" ?

Well I tried to understand my first post here, so I did homework.

I took an electron, and I calculated magnetic moment:

p = g*e*L/2*m, where g is approximately 2 and L=sqrt(s(s+1))hbar.
This is a source of static magnetic field H or B. But how do I calculate it?

But I meet with problem when I try to calculate electric momentum, which should be a source of static electric field. I can only calculate electric moment for two particles: p = e l, where l is distance between them.

Did I meet with "monopole - dipole" problem?

How do I calculate electric field of single particle?

If I done any mistake, I would be glad if you express it.
 
I think it's very interesting subject, becouse here we come to fundamental source of magnetic and electric field... :rolleyes:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top