Figure out horizontal force necessary to move an object

AI Thread Summary
To determine the horizontal force needed to move an object with a coefficient of kinetic friction of zero, it is essential to overcome the maximum static friction, which is also likely zero in this scenario. Once the object is in motion, if kinetic friction is zero, no additional force is required to maintain that motion. An initial impulse is necessary to start the movement, but thereafter, no force is needed to keep it moving. This understanding clarifies the relationship between static and kinetic friction in this context. The discussion concludes with the realization that the problem was solved independently.
jshaner858
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
how do you figure out horizontal force necessary to move an object if the coefficient of kinetic friction is zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It must be just big enough to over come the maxium static friction, then it will drop to the kinetic friction value of zero. But if kinetic friction is zero, it would probably be true that static friction is zero as well. But if you are moving, and you have zero kinetic friction, it takes zero force to keep it moving. You just need to give it an impulse to get it moving in the first place.
 
thx that helped...i actually figured it out on my own...
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Back
Top