Filtering resumes or employing individuals

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtong
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on effective resume writing and the importance of presentation in job applications. Key points include the preference for a clear layout with the applicant's name prominently displayed, the use of bullet points for easy skimming, and the significance of reference letters, particularly those that highlight exceptional qualities. The consensus suggests that while resumes often follow a similar format, the quality of work and the ability to generate strong recommendations are crucial. New PhDs are advised to focus on articulating their teaching philosophies and research plans, as well as to engage in meaningful work that can lead to positive word-of-mouth endorsements. Overall, the emphasis is on producing quality work and fostering relationships that can enhance one's professional reputation.
mtong
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello, after reading through the forum i see that many of you (at one stage or another) have been responsible for filtering resumes or employing individuals.

Do you have any pet hates, do / do-nots for writing CVs or any other helpful tips?

Thank You in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everyone has different things they like and don't like. Your best bet is to employ a general strategy that appeals to the majority of readers. Personally I like putting my name in the top left corner with a bigger font and in bold. I also try to use bullets as much as possible. The layout can be designed to catch the readers eye and make it easy for the reader to skim through the information. It is hard to explain what layouts work really well on a message board though, because I'd have to show you examples. You can probably search online for tips and stuff. I read a book that covered resume writing in detail and it helped me a great deal.
 
the resumes are mostly all the same. its the reference letters i focus on. i try to distinguish between letters that say the person is ok and letters that say the person is really exceptional.

i.e. the main thing you can do in preparing your resume is to do good work, and make people aware of it. then they say the nice things about you behind your back.

but if you happen to have some significant publications in a good journal make that clear.

new phd's can do little to enhance their own resume except maybe write a persuasive letter about their teaching philosophy, and their plans for research, but even then it is far easier to aspire to be a good teacher than to be one.

but any really intelligent ideas on research may come through. just do the best work you can, and talk to people about it, and let them say things about you that you would never think of yourself.

if someone actually solves one of my conjectures, on his own, then i say strong things about him. up until then it's mostly, "he/she knows a lot and works hard, and it looks as if he/she will turn out well".
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
963
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Back
Top