Final Value Theorem Rule Clarification

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Initial Value Theorem (IVT) and Final Value Theorem (FVT) to a given Laplace transform problem. The user is confused about the conditions under which these theorems apply, particularly regarding the stipulation that poles must be in the left half of the s-domain for FVT and the absence of impulse functions for IVT. They note discrepancies between their professor's explanation and the textbook definitions, leading to uncertainty about whether either theorem can be applied to their problem. The user concludes that, according to their professor, neither theorem is applicable, while the textbook suggests FVT indicates that the final value of f(t) approaches zero. Clarification from knowledgeable sources is sought to resolve these conflicting interpretations.
chrispypatt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My homework problem is as follows:
Consider the Laplace transform shown below.
(4s3+15s2+s+30)/(s2+5s+6)

a. What is the value of f(t=0) and f(t=∞)? Use the initial and final value theorems.
b. Find the inverse transform f(t). Use this expression to find f(t=0) and f(t=∞) and compare with the result of part a).I know to find the final value, using FVT, limt->inff(t)=lims->0sF(s), but I am given the stipulation that the poles must be in the left side of the domain. My book words the definition of IVT and FVT by saying IVT is only valid if f(t) has no impulse functions (the function must be rational) and that for FVT, we must add the rule about the poles. I am confused because everywhere online, including how my professor explained it, is that the impulse rule applies to ONLY IVT and the poles ONLY applies to FVT.

If I went with how my prof taught, Neither theorem can be applied to the problem but if I go by the book's wording, IVT does not apply but FVT shows the final value of f(t) will go to 0.

If someone more knowledgeable with these two theorems could clarify this, that would be helpful! Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In future posts, please don't delete the homework template -- its use is required.
chrispypatt said:
My homework problem is as follows:
Consider the Laplace transform shown below.
(4s3+15s2+s+30)/(s2+5s+6)
Presumably, the above is F(s); i.e., ##\mathcal{L}[f(t)]##.
chrispypatt said:
a. What is the value of f(t=0) and f(t=∞)? Use the initial and final value theorems.
b. Find the inverse transform f(t). Use this expression to find f(t=0) and f(t=∞) and compare with the result of part a).I know to find the final value, using FVT, limt->inff(t)=lims->0sF(s), but I am given the stipulation that the poles must be in the left side of the domain.
I'm not familiar with either of these theorems, and I don't understand how this stipulation fits in.
What I do know is that ##\mathcal{L}[f'(t)] = sF(s) - f(0)##, where F(s) is as above.
For the b) part, I would carry out long division, and for the remainder, use partial fractions to write it as a sum of two fractions.
chrispypatt said:
My book words the definition of IVT and FVT by saying IVT is only valid if f(t) has no impulse functions (the function must be rational) and that for FVT, we must add the rule about the poles. I am confused because everywhere online, including how my professor explained it, is that the impulse rule applies to ONLY IVT and the poles ONLY applies to FVT.

If I went with how my prof taught, Neither theorem can be applied to the problem but if I go by the book's wording, IVT does not apply but FVT shows the final value of f(t) will go to 0.

If someone more knowledgeable with these two theorems could clarify this, that would be helpful! Thanks in advance.
 
chrispypatt said:
My homework problem is as follows:
Consider the Laplace transform shown below.
(4s3+15s2+s+30)/(s2+5s+6)

a. What is the value of f(t=0) and f(t=∞)? Use the initial and final value theorems.
b. Find the inverse transform f(t). Use this expression to find f(t=0) and f(t=∞) and compare with the result of part a).I know to find the final value, using FVT, limt->inff(t)=lims->0sF(s), but I am given the stipulation that the poles must be in the left side of the domain. My book words the definition of IVT and FVT by saying IVT is only valid if f(t) has no impulse functions (the function must be rational) and that for FVT, we must add the rule about the poles. I am confused because everywhere online, including how my professor explained it, is that the impulse rule applies to ONLY IVT and the poles ONLY applies to FVT.

If I went with how my prof taught, Neither theorem can be applied to the problem but if I go by the book's wording, IVT does not apply but FVT shows the final value of f(t) will go to 0.

If someone more knowledgeable with these two theorems could clarify this, that would be helpful! Thanks in advance.

A lot of the on-line literature on these matters is confusing, and sometimes even self-contradictory (proving the result in one section, then showing a couner-example in another section). For the FVT, a nice article that sets it out properly and clearly is
http://www.me.umn.edu/courses/me3281/notes/TransformSolutionsToLTISystems_Part4.pdf .
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K