Financial, Multiple Compound Interest Problem

DKATyler
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am currently attempting to solve the following problem for a calculator I am constructing in Java.
Company 1 pays A% Interest every T days
Company 2 pays B% Interest (>A%) every T days

Company 1 has an initial investment of $X dollars
Company 2 requires an inital fee of $Y dollars to invest in their company ($Y does not pay any interest! It's a fee.)

At what point T in terms of A, B, X and Y should I stop investing in Company 1 and begin investing in Company 2 to obtain the maximum return at T=infinity? Investments are non-refundable.

Example:
$1,000 invested in A at 3% interest
B pays 8% interest
B requires a $1,000 fee to invest.

By brute force calculation, the optimum T value is approx 16 for this example. ($1604.71 invested in Company 1). This results in the first interest earning investment in B at T=39. (Only slightly later then T=0 with $1000 in company where the first interest earning payment would be made at T=36).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a linear optimization and the simplex algorithm should do. However, if ##T## tends to infinity, there will never occur a ROI.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top