Find a 5-Digit Number with Unique Prime & Square Digits

  • Thread starter Thread starter bracey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a unique 5-digit number that meets specific criteria, including having no identical digits, two perfect square digits, two prime digits, and one digit that is neither. The conditions also specify relationships between the digits, such as the second digit being six less than the fourth and the last digit being half of the third. Initial attempts to solve the puzzle included various combinations, but they failed to meet all conditions. Ultimately, the number 73894 is proposed as the correct solution. The conversation highlights the challenge of satisfying all mathematical constraints while ensuring digit uniqueness.
bracey
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just abit of fun!

Find a 5 digit number that:
· Has no two identical digits.
· Has two digits that are perfect squares.
· Has two digits that are prime.
· Has one digit that is neither prime, or a perfect square.
· That has the second digit six less than the fourth digit.
· That has the last digit half of the third digit.
· That has the first digit three greater than the last digit.
What's the number?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by bracey
Find a 5 digit number that:
· Has no two identical digits.
· Has two digits that are perfect squares.
· Has two digits that are prime.
· Has one digit that is neither prime, or a perfect square.
· That has the second digit six less than the fourth digit.
· That has the last digit half of the third digit.
· That has the first digit three greater than the last digit.
What's the number?
ABCDE
A49DE
A3492
53492

am I right? that is how my process went
 
none of those digits satisifies 'neither prime nor square'
 
Originally posted by matt grime
none of those digits satisifies 'neither prime nor square'
oh, you're right :(
 
I think the answer is 73894.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top