Find a function from a Recursive Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter loveinla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula involving probabilities P_{t}^{x} and expectations. The expectation is clarified to be with respect to the variable θ, which ranges from 0 to 1. A key concern is the lack of a decreasing value for "x" in the recurrence, raising questions about the initial values needed for the function. The problem is identified as a one-armed bandit scenario where θ is a random variable to be determined. The main inquiry is about finding the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}.
loveinla
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'd like to solve a function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula below.

W_{t}^{x}=P_{t}^{x}*W_{t+1}^{x+1}+(1 - P_{t}^{x})*W_{t+1}^{x},

where P_{t}^{x} = \frac{E[\theta^{x+1}*(1 - \theta)^{t-x}]}{E[\theta^{x}*(1-\theta)^{t-x}]}, {\underset{t\to\infty, x\to 0}{lim}}W_{t}^{x} =0. Here E stands for expectation.

Any suggestions? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
loveinla said:
E stands for expectation.

Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?
 
dodo said:
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?

Thanks, you are right, the expectation is with respect to \theta, which is on [0,1].

The initial value is indeed what I am trying to find.

In fact, it is a one-armed bandit problem with Bernoulli probability \theta, but \theta is a random variable we are trying to figure out through the realization.

Any idea on how to determine the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top