Find a Mistake in Proof: 0,1,2,3 are All Even

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demonoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mistake Proof
Demonoid
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Basically I need to find a mistake in this "proof".

I claim that 0,1,2,3...are all even.

I will use induction to prove that 'n is even' for n = 0,1,2,3...
Base case is n = 0, which is true, 0 is even. I assume that the statement is true for
n = 0,1,2,3...,k and consider n = k+1. By assumption, 1 and k are both even, and thus k+1 is even as well. This means that n = 0,1,2,3... are all even.

I can't seem to find a hole in the proof. I know that 1 is not even and when we add 1 to an even number, we get an odd number. But, by assumption 1 is even, so, what do I do know ?:-p
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try your argument when getting from k = 0 to k = 1.
 
If k is even, then k+1 is odd...
 
There is nothing wrong in you proof...wat you are doing is dat you are assigning a subscript for each even number so A0=0, A1=2...so by induction you r getting this peculiar result which is for the subscript...:smile:
 
As LCKurtz said, the problem is between 0 and 1. You seem to be tacitly assuming that k is greater than 1 when you say that 1 is even by the inductive hypothesis. But for k=0, this isn't true since k+1=1.
 
spamiam said:
As LCKurtz said, the problem is between 0 and 1. You seem to be tacitly assuming that k is greater than 1 when you say that 1 is even by the inductive hypothesis. But for k=0, this isn't true since k+1=1.

More accurately, his argument fails because he can't choose 1 and k > 1 to add together in the induction step because there is no such k.

The real lesson in this example is that in induction arguments, the induction step must be independent of the value of k, which it isn't in this argument.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
555
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Back
Top