MHB Find ab if log_b(a) = log_a(b)

  • Thread starter Thread starter My Name is Earl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
If log_b(a) = log_a(b) with conditions that a ≠ b, ab > 0, and neither a nor b is 1, then the value of ab is determined to be 1. By letting x = log_a(b) = log_b(a), it follows that a^x = b and b^x = a. Dividing these equations leads to the conclusion that (a/b)^x = (a/b)^{-1}. This implies that ab = 1. The consensus among participants confirms this solution.
My Name is Earl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have tried various methods to solve this...

If logb(a) = loga(b) where a != b (!= means does not equal), ab > 0 and neither a nor b are 1, then what is the value of ab?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My Name is Earl said:
I have tried various methods to solve this...

If logb(a) = loga(b) where a != b (!= means does not equal), ab > 0 and neither a nor b are 1, then what is the value of ab?

Let's let:

$$x=\log_a(b)=\log_b(a)$$

Now this implies:

$$a^x=b$$

$$b^x=a$$

Dividing the former by the latter, we obtain:

$$\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^x=\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1}$$

What does this imply?
 
MarkFL said:
Let's let:

$$x=\log_a(b)=\log_b(a)$$

Now this implies:

$$a^x=b$$

$$b^x=a$$

Dividing the former by the latter, we obtain:

$$\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^x=\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1}$$

What does this imply?

This implies that ab = 1
 
My Name is Earl said:
This implies that ab = 1

Yes, that's what I found as well. (Yes)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top