MHB Find ab if log_b(a) = log_a(b)

  • Thread starter Thread starter My Name is Earl
  • Start date Start date
My Name is Earl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have tried various methods to solve this...

If logb(a) = loga(b) where a != b (!= means does not equal), ab > 0 and neither a nor b are 1, then what is the value of ab?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My Name is Earl said:
I have tried various methods to solve this...

If logb(a) = loga(b) where a != b (!= means does not equal), ab > 0 and neither a nor b are 1, then what is the value of ab?

Let's let:

$$x=\log_a(b)=\log_b(a)$$

Now this implies:

$$a^x=b$$

$$b^x=a$$

Dividing the former by the latter, we obtain:

$$\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^x=\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1}$$

What does this imply?
 
MarkFL said:
Let's let:

$$x=\log_a(b)=\log_b(a)$$

Now this implies:

$$a^x=b$$

$$b^x=a$$

Dividing the former by the latter, we obtain:

$$\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^x=\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1}$$

What does this imply?

This implies that ab = 1
 
My Name is Earl said:
This implies that ab = 1

Yes, that's what I found as well. (Yes)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top