MHB Find all functions satisfying f(mn)=f(m)f(n), and m+n|f(m)+f(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding functions f: ℕ → ℕ that satisfy the equations f(mn) = f(m)f(n) and m+n | f(m) + f(n) for all natural numbers m and n. Participants note that odd powers of n exhibit this property, suggesting a relationship between the equations and polynomial forms. There is uncertainty about whether the identified solutions are exhaustive. A typo in the suggested solution is also mentioned, indicating a need for clarification. The conversation emphasizes the exploration of functional equations within number theory.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find all functions, $f: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, satisfying

\[f(mn)=f(m)f(n),\: \: \: and \: \: \: m+n \: \: |\: \: f(m)+f(n)\]for all $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find all functions, $f: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, satisfying

\[f(mn)=f(m)f(n),\: \: \: and \: \: \: m+n \: \: |\: \: f(m)+f(n)\]for all $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$.

by putting m = 1 we get $f(n) = f(1) f(n)$ so $f(1) = 1$

now 1 + n is a factor of 1 + f(n) so by inspection f(n) = n. I do not have a proof of the same
 
Last edited:
kaliprasad said:
by putting m = 1 we get $f(n) = f(1) f(n)$ so $f(1) = 1$

now 1 + n is a factor of 1 + f(n) so by inspection f(n) = n. I do not have a proof of the same
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]

Right
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]

there is a typo in above

$(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$

should be

$m^k+n^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^{k-1})$
 
Suggested solution:
As kaliprasad noted: $f(1) = 1$. So, $2n+1 \;\; | \;\; f(2n) + f(1) = f(2) \cdot f(n) + 1 \Rightarrow gcd(2n+1,f(2)) = 1$ for all $n$. This means, that $f(2)$ has no odd prime divisor, so $f(2) = 2^k$. Furthermore, $3 \;\; | 1 + f(2) = 1 + 2^k \Rightarrow k$ is odd (as Opalg noted). Also note, $f(2^m) = f(2) \cdot f(2) \cdot … \cdot f(2) = 2^{km}$ for all $m$. Now, for all $m$ and $n$, $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; f(2^{m}) + f(n) = 2^{km} + f(n)$. But $k$ is odd, so $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; 2^{km} + n^k$. Thus $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; f(n)-n^k$. But this is valid for all $m$, so $f(n) – n^k = 0 \Rightarrow f(n) = n^k.$
We have now proven, that $f(n) = n^k$ for all $n$ for some fixed odd number $k$. On the other hand, it is easily seen that functions of this form satisfy the given conditions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top