Find car's acceleration based on a die's angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicslyDumb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Angle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating a car's acceleration based on the deflection of a fuzzy die hanging from the rearview mirror at a 15-degree angle. Participants identify errors in the initial calculations, specifically regarding the triangle formed by the die's angle, noting that the opposite side and hypotenuse were miscalculated. Despite these errors, the method used for the calculation is deemed correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately applying trigonometric principles to solve the problem. Overall, the focus is on correcting the calculations while maintaining the integrity of the approach.
PhysicslyDumb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A fuzzy die hanging from a string of a car's rear view mirror is deflected 15 degrees from the vertical. what is the car's acceleration if the die's mass is 250g


Homework Equations


basic forces equations
trig


The Attempt at a Solution



attempt attached as a .png
 

Attachments

  • car acceleration.png
    car acceleration.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 573
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicslyDumb said:

Homework Statement


A fuzzy die hanging from a string of a car's rear view mirror is deflected 15 degrees from the vertical. what is the car's acceleration if the die's mass is 250g

Homework Equations


basic forces equations
trig

The Attempt at a Solution



attempt attached as a .png

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


You have an error in Fx ?

if that is a triangle with a 15o angle, then the opposite side is not what you said - much smaller. The hypotenuse isn't that big either ?

Other than that, your reasoning is good.

EDIT: looks like you used 20o
 
PeterO said:
You have an error in Fx ?

if that is a triangle with a 15o angle, then the opposite side is not what you said - much smaller. The hypotenuse isn't that big either ?

Other than that, your reasoning is good.

EDIT: looks like you used 20o

ahh right, the calculations are wrong, but is the method right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top