Find distance before rest given length and angle of incline

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier descending a hill inclined at 9.1° and gliding along a horizontal surface before coming to rest. The hill is 250 m long, and the coefficient of friction is provided for both the slope and the horizontal surface. The objective is to determine the distance the skier travels on the horizontal portion before stopping.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effects of friction on the skier's motion, questioning the necessity of the skier's mass for calculating the stopping distance. There are attempts to apply energy conservation principles and work-energy theorem, but some express confusion about how to proceed without the mass.

Discussion Status

There are various lines of reasoning being explored, including the calculation of kinetic energy at the bottom of the slope and the work done by friction. Some participants have provided theoretical insights, while others are struggling with the implications of missing information, particularly the skier's mass. No consensus has been reached, and the discussion remains open-ended with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the skier's mass in determining frictional forces, which complicates the calculations. There is also mention of constraints related to homework submission limits, adding pressure to arrive at a correct solution.

mandy9008
Messages
127
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A skier starts from rest at the top of a hill that is inclined at 9.1° with the horizontal. The hillside is 250 m long, and the coefficient of friction between snow and skis is 0.0750. At the bottom of the hill, the snow is level and the coefficient of friction is unchanged. How far does the skier glide along the horizontal portion of the snow before coming to rest?


The Attempt at a Solution


250sin9.1= 39.5 (height of hill)

v2 = 2gh
v2 = 2 (9.8 m/s2)(39.5m)
v= 27.8 m/s

d= v2 / 2 u g
d= 27.8 m/s / 2 (0.0750) (9.8 m/s2)
d= 18.9 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the mass of the skier?
 
No, i do not know the mass of the skier.
 
That is weird because friction force depends on the normal force which depends on the mass of the object.
By the way, you did not take into account friction here:

v2 = 2gh
v2 = 2 (9.8 m/s2)(39.5m)
v= 27.8 m/s
 

Attachments

  • ramp.JPG
    ramp.JPG
    5.7 KB · Views: 477
I used the coefficient of kinetic friction when I solved for the distance
 
Yes but there is friction in the slope also. In my opinion this problem should be split into two parts, first find the velocity and the end of the slope then find the distance required to stop. The later one can be solved using work energy theorem, but I still don't see how to do this without the mass. Sorry, maybe someone else can help you more. Good luck.
 
all I can give you is theory atm.. .

the skier gains kinetic energy on the way down. at the bottom of the slope Ek = Eg-W

W= (coefficient of kinetic friction * mass * gravity)(distance along the slope)

so then you just take Ek at the bottom and sub in for W=uFn*d

W/uFn = d
 
how do I get the W?
 
oh just read the question

mgh - umg = 1/2mv^2

9.8*h-0.075*9.8=1/2v^2

9.725(39.53)=1/2v^2

384.52*2=v^2

27.73m/s
 
  • #10
W/uFn = d

27.73/0.075(mg)=d

27.73 / (0.735m) = d

i have no clue how to get beyond this point.

lol try calculating mass
 
  • #11
joshmdmd said:
W/uFn = d

27.73/0.075(mg)=d

27.73 / (0.735m) = d

i have no clue how to get beyond this point.

lol try calculating mass

this is wrong.. stupid mistake

27.73 has to be converted to energy .. gl
 
  • #12
okay so I was just playing around with these numbers and I divided 27.73m/s / 9.8m/s^2 and got 2.83m. When I entered this number, the response told me that I was off by a multiple of 10. I only have one submission left before I reach the max, so I want to get this one right. Any ideas?
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K