Find E field for a ring of charge - Charge per length non-uniform

venkman1080
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have to find the E field at all points on the z-axis for a ring of charge with radius = R. \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) where 0 \leq \phi < 2 \pi

I know how to do the problem when it is the charge per length is uniform but when I do the calculation for the non-uniform case I get E = \frac{-kR\lambda_0\pi}{(R^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} \hat{i} The integral for the j_hat part goes to zero because sin(phi)cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi and the z_hat part also goes to zero because the integral of cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi is zero.

I think my calculations are right, but I'm not totally sure. I just find it strange that its only in the i_hat. Any help/suggestions is greatly appreciated.

I used the formulas
<br /> E = \int_{charge} \frac{kdq}{r_\delta ^2}\hat{r_\delta}<br />

<br /> r_\delta = -R cos(\phi)\hat{i} - R sin(\phi)\hat{j} + x\hat{k}<br />

<br /> \hat{r_\delta} = \frac{-R cos(\phi)\hat{i}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}<br /> - \frac{R sin(\phi)\hat{j}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}} + \frac{z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}<br />

<br /> dq = \lambda Rd\phi<br />
Sorry if there is any typos with the latex formulas. I kept doing the preview post and it wouldn't change what I had entered the first time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
venkman1080 said:
The integral for the j_hat part goes to zero because sin(phi)cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi and the z_hat part also goes to zero because the integral of cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi is zero.

Sounds like you're multiplying every component by an extra factor of \cos\phi before integrating...why are you doing that?
 
I thought because \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) so when you do the integral the cos doesn't pull out.
 
venkman1080 said:
I thought because \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) so when you do the integral the cos doesn't pull out.

Yes, I overlooked that. Your answer looks good to me.
 
I'm just having trouble visualizing why the answer is only in the i_hat. Can you help clarify this for me?
 
Think symmetry. For every spot on the ring, there's a spot on the opposite side with the same charge in magnitude but with opposite sign.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top