Find E_r & E_θ for Grounded Conducting Sphere in Uniform Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Field
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a grounded conducting sphere placed in a uniform electric field, with a specific potential function provided. Participants are tasked with finding the radial and angular components of the electric field, denoted as E_r and E_θ, respectively.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the applicability of equations for electric fields derived from potential in the context of dipoles, questioning their relevance to the current problem. There is also a focus on understanding the gradient in spherical coordinates and its implications for the electric field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking the derivation of equations and understanding the context of the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the terminology used in the question, particularly regarding the surface charge distribution and its interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion stemming from the wording of the problem, particularly concerning the term "surface charge distribution" and its relation to surface charge density. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the definitions and implications of these terms in the context of the problem.

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


Grounded conducting sphere in uniform electric field has potential
V(r,θ) = -Vo(1 - (R/r)3)*cosθ

Find Er and Eθ.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


In the textbook I found
Er = -∂V/∂r

Eθ = -1/r ∂V/∂θ

Those are in the chapter we're working with but those two equations are in the section talking about the electric field of dipoles. Do those equations apply for the problem I'm working on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition: ##\vec E = -\vec\nabla V## ... you will need ##\nabla## in spherical-polar coordinates.

Check how the equations in your book were derived - make sure you understand the reasoning involved. Then you can make a determination about how appropriate they are for your situation.
 
Simon Bridge said:
By definition: ##\vec E = -\vec\nabla V## ... you will need ##\nabla## in spherical-polar coordinates.

Check how the equations in your book were derived - make sure you understand the reasoning involved. Then you can make a determination about how appropriate they are for your situation.
the front of the book has a legend for the gradient in spherical coordinates so i used that. the question was just worded weird.

also, the question asks for "surface charge distribution of the sphere".
is that just the surface charge density?

σ = q/A?
 
or ρ = ∈o∇E
 
nmsurobert said:
the front of the book has a legend for the gradient in spherical coordinates so i used that. the question was just worded weird.
Then you have the answer to your first question - well done.

also, the question asks for "surface charge distribution of the sphere".
is that just the surface charge density?
This is another odd wording I think. You seem quite good at figuring this stuff out...
How would you normally express a charge distribution?
 
The word "distribution" is what's throwing me off but if this were an exam I'd say it's asking for area charge density. That's how the charge is distributed over the surface per unit area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K