Find equivalent resistance R in the circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equivalent resistance in a circuit involving multiple resistors. Participants explore the configuration of resistors, particularly the distinction between parallel and series arrangements, and the implications for circuit analysis methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of parallel and series resistors, question the applicability of circuit analysis methods like Kirchhoff's laws, and consider the use of transformations such as delta-wye. There are inquiries about algorithms for approaching complex circuits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their experiences with circuit analysis methods, while others have expressed uncertainty about their understanding. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of Kirchhoff's laws and the potential use of transformations, although there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of missing familiarity with certain methods and the complexity introduced by multiple unknowns in the circuit analysis. Participants are navigating the challenges of applying learned concepts to this specific problem.

valhakla
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Help me to find the total resistance between two points A and B. I have tried to find the total resistance using the formulas Rparralel1 = 2R * 2R /2R+2R, Rparallel2 = 6R *3R / 6R + 3R, and R total = Rparralel1 + Rparralel2 + 2R, the answer was incorrect. Can you tell me where is my mistake, and how can I determine parallel and series resistors to find the total resistance in such circuits?
Relevant Equations
R_parallel = R1 * R2 / R1 + R2, R_series = R1 + R2
Screenshot 2023-05-31 at 17.59.50.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
valhakla said:
Rparralel1 = 2R * 2R /2R+2R,
The two R2 on the left are not parallel. To count as parallel, the two resistors must be directly connected to each other, with no intervening resistance, at each end.
 
I should add to what @haruspex noted that if two resistors are not parallel, this does not mean that they must be in series. It is entirely possible to have circuits where there are no parallel or series combinations.
 
@valhakla What circuit analysis methods have you learned? Have you covered KCL, KVL? How about mesh and nodal analysis? Perhaps delta-Y and y-delta transforms?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
gneill said:
@valhakla What circuit analysis methods have you learned? Have you covered KCL, KVL? How about mesh and nodal analysis? Perhaps delta-Y and y-delta transforms
Yes, I have tried to apply Kirchkhoff's and loop rule for this ciruit, but it didn't helped, as it gives only the values of the current flowing through particular resistor not the total resistance between points A and B. Regarding the transforms, I am not familiar with that yet.
 
haruspex said:
The two R2 on the left are not parallel. To count as parallel, the two resistors must be directly connected to each other, with no intervening resistance, at each end.
I understood. So are there any algorithms to approach such circuits? This is my first time encountering this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: valhakla
valhakla said:
Yes, I have tried to apply Kirchkhoff's and loop rule for this ciruit
That’s enough to solve the problem. If that’s all you have covered in class so far, I’d guess that’s what you are meant to use.

Add a battery (emf ##= E##) between A and B so you have a complete circuit.

Analyse the circuit using Kirchhoff’s first law (the ‘current rule’) and second law (the ‘loop rule’). You can find the total current, ##I##, entering A (or leaving B) in terms of ##E## and ##R##.

The resistance between A and B is then ##\frac EI##. ##E## should cancel and the answer will be some multiple of ##R##.

It’s messy because you have a lot of unknown currents.

Note the circuit is ‘linear’. Without loss of generality, you can consider the case with ##R=1 \Omega## and take the battery’s emf as some convenient arbitrary value (e.g. ##E =10V##). The final answer will be a multiple of ##R##, not ohms. However, if you are not comfortable with this ‘shortcut’ you will need to work with the symbols ##R## and ##E##.

Post your working if you need further help.

Also, note spelling: Kirchhoff.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
  • #10
Steve4Physics said:
Add a battery (emf ##= E##) between A and B so you have a complete circuit.
I tried to add 10V battery, but my final answer wasn't even close. However the delta-wye transformation method helped me to finally solve the problem.
 
  • #11
valhakla said:
I tried to add 10V battery, but my final answer wasn't even close.
The risk of algebra/arithmetic errors is high with 5 unknowns! But it will work.

valhakla said:
However the delta-wye transformation method helped me to finally solve the problem.
It's a good choice if you are allowed to use that method.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: valhakla

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K