Find Focal Length of Biconcave Lens with Galilean Telescope

  • Thread starter Thread starter davevresk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean Telescope
AI Thread Summary
In a lab setup involving a Galilean telescope, a convex lens with a focal length of about 20 cm is paired with a biconcave lens of unknown focal length, positioned 15 cm away. The experiment aims to determine the focal length of the biconcave lens using ray diagrams and the thin lens law. The participant notes discrepancies between their ray diagram and textbook examples, particularly regarding the behavior of light through the biconcave lens. They express confusion about whether the light entering the ocular lens is parallel and how this affects convergence. Ultimately, the participant believes they have resolved their confusion regarding the focal length calculation.
davevresk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. For a Lab I have set up a "galilean telescope" where the objective lens a convex lens with focal length about 20 cm (F) and a biconcave lens of unknown focal length. I placed the biconcave lens at about 15 cm away from the convex lens as the ocular (so closer than the focal point) and then focused parallel light onto a screen. The distance between the screen and the objective lens was measured to be slightly longer than the focal length of the objective lens (about 22 cm). The question is to find the focal length of the biconcave lens using ray diagrams and the thin lens law.



Homework Equations


Thin lens law: 1/f=(n-1)(1/r1 - 1/r2) where n is the refractive index of the lens.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn a ray diagram but it doesn't seem to match what is in the textbook. The book only shows diagrams where light enters the biconcave lens and come out parallel, but that wouldn't focus the light right? So it must not come out parallel in this case. So in my diagram the incident (parallel) light is bent inwards by the objective lens to a focal point that is beyond the ocular lens, so before it is actually focused, it goes through the ocular (biconcave) lens at which point it is bent to an angle that doesn't converge quite as fast so it focuses at point beyond the focal point of the objective light. I don't really know how this helps me because the light entering the ocular is not parallel and so it doesn't converge on the lens focal point (or does it). Also we are not given the radius of the lenses or the index of refraction in the lab manual, so I don't really see how thin lens law really helps at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nm, i think i figured it out
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top