Find Focal Length of Biconcave Lens with Galilean Telescope

  • Thread starter Thread starter davevresk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean Telescope
davevresk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. For a Lab I have set up a "galilean telescope" where the objective lens a convex lens with focal length about 20 cm (F) and a biconcave lens of unknown focal length. I placed the biconcave lens at about 15 cm away from the convex lens as the ocular (so closer than the focal point) and then focused parallel light onto a screen. The distance between the screen and the objective lens was measured to be slightly longer than the focal length of the objective lens (about 22 cm). The question is to find the focal length of the biconcave lens using ray diagrams and the thin lens law.



Homework Equations


Thin lens law: 1/f=(n-1)(1/r1 - 1/r2) where n is the refractive index of the lens.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn a ray diagram but it doesn't seem to match what is in the textbook. The book only shows diagrams where light enters the biconcave lens and come out parallel, but that wouldn't focus the light right? So it must not come out parallel in this case. So in my diagram the incident (parallel) light is bent inwards by the objective lens to a focal point that is beyond the ocular lens, so before it is actually focused, it goes through the ocular (biconcave) lens at which point it is bent to an angle that doesn't converge quite as fast so it focuses at point beyond the focal point of the objective light. I don't really know how this helps me because the light entering the ocular is not parallel and so it doesn't converge on the lens focal point (or does it). Also we are not given the radius of the lenses or the index of refraction in the lab manual, so I don't really see how thin lens law really helps at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nm, i think i figured it out
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top