Find molarity, seemingly simple but I can't do it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bublik13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molarity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the molarity of lauryl alcohol in a solution with ethanol. The original poster mistakenly assumed the problem was about molarity, leading to confusion in their calculations. Key points include the correct identification of the problem as one of molality, not molarity, which simplifies the solution process. The final mass of the solution is correctly noted as the sum of the individual masses, but the volumes are not additive when mixing different substances. The clarification that the question pertains to molality resolves the confusion, allowing for a straightforward calculation.
bublik13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Lauryl alcohol, C12H25OH, is prepared from coconut oil; it is used to make sodium lauryl sulfate, a synthetic detergent. What is the molarity of lauryl alcohol in a solution of 17.1g lauryl alcohol dissolved in 148g ethanol, C2H5OH?

a) 0.310m b) 0.620m c) 0.842m d) 1.41m e) 2.52m

Note: I'm not sure, but I think that the internet is allowed for this problem, in the sense that we can look up the densities of both the lauryl alcohol and the ethanol, because I see no way to solve this problem otherwise. (I can't solve it with the densities anyway)

Homework Equations



n=m/M
d=m/v


The Attempt at a Solution



1) There is 17.1g of C12H25OH
molar mass of C12H25OH is 186.18g/mol
number of moles of C12H25OH is 0.09185mol

2) There is 148g of C2H5OH
molar mass of C2H5OH is 46.08g/mol
number of moles of C2H5OH is 3.2118mol

3) The density, or (m/v) of C12H25OH is 0.8309g/mL (I used the internet for this step and the following)

4) The density, or (m/v) of C2H5OH is 0.789g/mL

5) This is where I start to feel unsure.
17.1g/v=0.8309g/mL
v(C12H25OH)= 0.0206L

6) 148g/v=0.789g/mL
v(C2H5OH)=0.1876L

7) total volume = 0.0206L + 0.1876L = 0.2082L

8) 0.09185mol/0.2082L = 0.4412m, which does not correspond with any of the answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how to solve the problem more precisely, unless someone will find a table of densities of lauryl alcohol in ethanol solutions (don't waste your time trying too hard).

The only thing that is wrong is that you assumed final volume to be sum of both volumes - it will be not, as volumes are not additive*, BUT - for a given data, that's the best reasonable guess of what the final volume is. Check if ignoring volume of lauryl alcohol (that is, assuming final volume is that of ethanol - 187.6 mL) won't result in one of the given answers. If it does - that's what you were expected to do, sadly, that's not the correct approach. Alternatively, you can check if you will not get one of the answers given assuming total mass of 17.1+148 and density of pure ethanol - again, that won't give a correct answer in general, but it is one of the approximations used in such cases.

* If you combine two volumes of identical solution, volumes are additive - say, 50 mL of 1 M NaCl and 50 mL of 1 M NaCl gives 100 mL of 1 M NaCl. But when you mix different solutions or different substances, it won't work this way - 50 mL of water and 50 mL of ethanol yield 96.4 mL of a mixture. Differences are rarely large, but they do exist.

What you can be always sure about is that the final mass is the sum of both masses.
 
Borek - I appreciate your attempt to help, but I however made a mistake in reading the question.

Turns out "molality" was not a typo for "molarity" and the two mean different things.

My bad.
 
If it is about molality it is just plug and chug.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top