Find Nature of Stationary Point of y=e^(x/2)-ln(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter icystrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the stationary point of the function y=e^(x/2) - ln(x) for x>0. The derivative is calculated as dy/dx = 0.5e^(x/2) - 1/x, and setting this equal to zero leads to the equation ln(2) - 0.5x = ln(x). It is noted that ln(2) - 0.5x is a decreasing function, while ln(x) is increasing, indicating a single intersection point at approximately (1.13429, 0.126007) found using the Newton-Raphson method. Participants emphasize the importance of graphing the function to identify where the slope may be zero before differentiation.
icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that there is only one stationary point of the curve y=e^{x/2} - ln (x), where x>0 and determine the nature of the stationary point.


My approach:

dy/dx = 0.5e^{x/2} - 1/x

When dy/dx=0 For stationary point.

Thus, through algebraic manipulation,

ln(2)-0.5x=ln(x)

Since,ln(2)-0.5x is a deacreasing function ,

and ln(x) is a increasing function with an horizontal asymptote of x=0.

Therefore , there is only an intersection at coordinate (1.13429 , 0.126007) by Newton-raphson method.

Correct me if I am wrong or please show me a prove that is more elegant.:frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to find a zero slope (where the derivative vanishes) not a root. I haven't worked this out yet myself, but your methodology looks correct to me.

Thanks
Matt
 
CFDFEAGURU said:
You are trying to find a zero slope (where the derivative vanishes) not a root. I haven't worked this out yet myself, but your methodology looks correct to me.

Thanks
Matt

A million thanks (=
Have a great day!
 
Remember you can always graph your original function before you perform any differentiation to see where there might be a slope of zero. This can be very helpful if you have a difficult function to diferentiate.

Thanks
Matt
 
CFDFEAGURU said:
Remember you can always graph your original function before you perform any differentiation to see where there might be a slope of zero. This can be very helpful if you have a difficult function to diferentiate.

Thanks
Matt

Noted (=
 
Oh wow... this looks quite elegant, if it's legitimate :smile:
I am completely lost on what you've done, and after seeing that for this equation, solving for x when dy/dx=0 cannot be done as simply as through my usual routine, I'm curious to what you've done.
If you don't mind, could you please elaborate on what the "through algebraic manipulation" actually involved and thus how you resulted in the next line?

dy/dx = 0.5e^{x/2} - 1/x


When dy/dx=0 For stationary point.

Thus, through algebraic manipulation,

ln(2)-0.5x=ln(x)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top