Find remaining vertices of cuboctahedron.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric Belcastro
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the remaining vertices of a regular cuboctahedron given three known vertices. The user initially sought confirmation of their approach using Maple software to explore Archimedean solids, expressing uncertainty about their calculations. They proposed using angles corresponding to the cuboctahedron's symmetries to derive additional vertices. Ultimately, the user successfully determined the remaining vertices by applying a quaternion rotation matrix based on the known vertices and their symmetries. They also corrected a mistake regarding the coordinates of one of the vertices.
Eric Belcastro
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
*note - this is not a homework problem.

I have the locations of three vertices of a regular cuboctahedron with edges of unit length (all vertices are length 1 from the center).

They are (1,0,0), (1/2, sqrt(3)/2, 0), (1/2, sqrt(3)/6, sqrt(2)/2)
or in spherical coordinates (1, 0, pi/2), (1, pi/3, pi/2), (1, pi/6, arctan(sqrt(2)/2)) respectively.

Now I am trying to find the remaining vertices of the cuboctahedron.

I believe I can find some of them easily, but I would like to be 100% certain of all of their accuracy. So I went to use maple's functions for defining and exploring archimedean solids, and to define an archimedean solid, you are only allowed to define one point, the center, and the radius, you can't specify any other vertices or angles.

It is really a simple problem, but I don't quite trust my intuition. I would assume I could just add angles where appropriate that correspond to the symmetries of a cuboctahedron and then convert back to cartesian coordinates. Any ideas of how to do this simply, or in maple?
If it is simple to do in maple, that would be nice, because there are many problems like this that pop up all the time when I am exploring something.

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I figured out how to find them, it was fairly easy. I just used a quaternion rotation matrix and rotated about the known vertices according to the known rotation symmetry of a cuboctahedron and did this a few times, generating new vertices, and all was well. I also wrote one of the coordinates wrong in the original post. The third vertex was (1/2,sqrt(3)/6,sqrt(6)/3.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top