Find Slope of Line & Solve Approximation Mistake: Answers Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter razored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ap
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the slope of the tangent line to the curve defined by the function y=e^(-x) at the point (4,0). The user initially calculated the derivative as -e^(-x) and substituted x=4, resulting in an incorrect slope of -0.018 instead of the correct value of -0.050. Additionally, the user attempted to approximate the integral of the function using three inscribed rectangles, leading to a miscalculation of the area as 5 instead of the correct value of 1. The errors stem from misunderstanding the evaluation points for the tangent line and the approximation method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of derivatives, specifically for exponential functions.
  • Knowledge of tangent lines and their equations.
  • Familiarity with Riemann sums and integral approximation techniques.
  • Ability to evaluate functions at specific points for accurate calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of derivatives and their applications in finding slopes of tangent lines.
  • Learn about Riemann sums and different methods for approximating integrals, including left-end point and right-end point evaluations.
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions and their derivatives in depth.
  • Practice solving problems involving tangent lines and approximations to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and integral approximations, as well as educators seeking to clarify common misconceptions in these topics.

razored
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Find the slope of the line containing the point (4,0) and tangent to the graph of y=e^(-x) : I found the derivative (-e^(-x)) and substituted x=4. I got an answer of -0.018 but the answer is -0.050.. what did i do wrong?If http://texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B3%7D%20%28x%5E2%20-4x%20%2B4%29dx%20.gif is approximated by 3 inscribed rectangles of equal width on the x-axis, then the approximation is : I got the answer of 5 but it is apparently 1. I did : 1(4)+ 1(1)+(1)(0) where the width of the rectnagles is 1 and and the second values are the respective y values at x.

What mistake did I make here as well?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tangent line passes through (4,0). It is not tangent to the curve when x= 4. Assume the line is tangent to the curve at, say, x= a and write the equation for the tangent line in terms of a. Set x= 4 and y= 0 and solve for a.

As far as your second question is concerned, I don't see how we can say what you did wrong when you don't say what you did! Of course, the result depends upon exactly where you evaluate the function in each interval so there are an infinite number of correct answers. What do you get if you choose the right endpoint of each interval to evaluate the function?
 
razored said:
I got the answer of 5 but it is apparently 1. I did : 1(4)+ 1(1)+(1)(0) where the width of the rectnagles is 1 and and the second values are the respective y values at x.
I was told to use 3 rectangles of equal width on the x-axis implying delta x =1 for each rectangle. Then I used the left-end point method. Consequently, (1)f(0) + 1f(1) + 1f(2) = 1(4)+ 1(1)+(1)(0) = 5 but the answer is 1. I don't see why.


For the first one, i did http://texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7B-x%7D%7D%7Bx-4%7D%3D-e%5E%7B-x%7D.gif which[/URL] I found x to be 5. I substituted 5 into -e^(-x) and that does not equal -.05 . What did I do wrong now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K