MHB Find Solution to Power & Resistance w/ 10 Ohm Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Resistance
Click For Summary
To achieve a 10 ohm resistance capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W using 10 ohm resistors rated for 1.0 W, a configuration of 9 resistors arranged in a 3x3 grid is necessary. This setup allows for parallel connections that reduce resistance while maintaining the total at 10 ohms through series connections. Each resistor in this configuration can handle the power without exceeding its limit. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how resistors behave in series and parallel to avoid damage. Properly combining these equations is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
dstorm
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Here is the question: You are given a number of 10 ohm resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.0 W without being destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or in parallel to make a 10 ohm resistance that is capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W?

When I attempted to do this problem, I had thought that power added in parallel, so I assumed that it would take 5 resistors. However, after checking to see if I was correct in the back of the book, I realized that I was doing something wrong. So now I'm left with the rules of resistance in parallel, being Rp(total) = Sum(Rp(i)) and the rule of resistance in series, being 1/(Rs(total)) = Sum(1/(Rs(i))). However, from here, I'm not sure how to manipulate these equations. How would I go about this problem? I'm sorry that I'm not very far along on it. It just stumped me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dstorm said:
Here is the question: You are given a number of 10 ohm resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.0 W without being destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or in parallel to make a 10 ohm resistance that is capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W?

When I attempted to do this problem, I had thought that power added in parallel, so I assumed that it would take 5 resistors. However, after checking to see if I was correct in the back of the book, I realized that I was doing something wrong. So now I'm left with the rules of resistance in parallel, being Rp(total) = Sum(Rp(i)) and the rule of resistance in series, being 1/(Rs(total)) = Sum(1/(Rs(i))). However, from here, I'm not sure how to manipulate these equations. How would I go about this problem? I'm sorry that I'm not very far along on it. It just stumped me.

Hi dstorm! Welcome to MHB! :)

If you put 2 resistors in series, the total resistance doubles.
And if you put 2 resistors in parallel, the total resistance is halved.

So suppose we put 2 in series and put them parallel to another 2 in series.
Then we will still have 10 Ohm as the total resistance.
What will the power dissipation in each resistor be?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi dstorm! Welcome to MHB! :)

If you put 2 resistors in series, the total resistance doubles.
And if you put 2 resistors in parallel, the total resistance is halved.

So suppose we put 2 in series and put them parallel to another 2 in series.
Then we will still have 10 Ohm as the total resistance.
What will the power dissipation in each resistor be?

Thanks! So the total power would be 4 W, because each can produce 1 W of power, right? So in order to get at least 5 W of power, we would need 9 resistors in a 3x3 form because the parallel ones would divide the resistance by 3 and the series ones would triple the resistance, thus equalizing it back to 10 ohms. So you can kinda combine the equations?
 
dstorm said:
Thanks! So the total power would be 4 W, because each can produce 1 W of power, right? So in order to get at least 5 W of power, we would need 9 resistors in a 3x3 form because the parallel ones would divide the resistance by 3 and the series ones would triple the resistance, thus equalizing it back to 10 ohms. So you can kinda combine the equations?

Yeah.
Theoretically a more convoluted circuit could be set up.
But then you get fractions that simply won't come out as 10 Ohm any more.
And anyway, the current has to be distributed evenly to avoid resistors from blowing up.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
674
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K