Find the Angle for Maximum x Position in Free Fall Motion

agro
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Consider a particle located at (x0, y0), having inital velocity v0, and the angle of inclination of the velocity vector is [the]. The particle is subjected to a vertical acceleration of -g. It's equation of motion is...

x = x0 + v0*cos[the]*t
y = y0 + v0*sin[the]*t - 0.5*g*t2

If t>0, the particle will reach y = 0 when
t = {v0*sin[the] + sqrt((v0*sin[the])2+2*g*y0)}/g

(found using the abc formula)

If we call the time t1, then at that time the x position of the particle is (call it x1)...

x1 = x0 + v0*cos[the]*t1

The question is: at initial height y0, what angle will make x1 maximum?

I found it very hard to make the equation simple enough to be able to solve this problem... Can anyone help me?

PS: in the case of y0 = 0, the problem will be easy to solve, with the answer 45 degrees.

Thank you...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Replacing t1 in x1= x0+ v0 cos[theta] t1

with t1= (v0/g)sin[theta]+ (1/g)(v0^2 sin^2 [theta]+ (gyo/2))^(1/2)
(the positive time at which y= 0) gives

x1= x0+ (v0^2/g)sin[theta]cos[theta]+(v0/g)sin[theta](v0^2sin^2[theta]+ (gy0/2))

Differentiating,

dx1/d[theta]= (v0^2/g)(cos^2[theta]- sin^2[theta])+ (v0/g)cos[theta](v0sin^2[theta]+(gy0/2))^(1/2)+ vo^3/g sin^2[theta]cos[theta](v0^2sin^2[theta] + (gy0/2))^(-1/2) = 0 at maximum x1.

I'm with you! I don't see any "nice" way of solving that for [theta]. Do you have any reason to think that there should be?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top