Find the domain of this function

  • Thread starter Thread starter calif2a8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Function
AI Thread Summary
The domain of the function sqrt(2x - x^3) requires that 2x - x^3 be non-negative. The correct approach involves factoring the expression to find critical points, specifically x(2 - x^2) ≥ 0, which leads to the intervals (-inf, -sqrt(2)] and [0, sqrt(2)]. A common mistake is dividing by x, which assumes x is not zero and can lead to incorrect conclusions about the domain. Understanding the behavior of the function at critical points and the graph's shape is essential for determining where the function is defined. The final domain is confirmed as (-inf, -sqrt(2)] and [0, sqrt(2)].
calif2a8
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What is the domain of sqrt(2x-x^3)

I thought this would be pretty straight forward but I am completely stumped. So obviously square root is not defined for (-inf, 0), therefore I said:

2x-x^3 >= 0

Working this out you get x <= sqrt(2) as the domain.

That is partially correct but I can't for the life of me get the rest of the answer.
The final answer is (-inf,-sqrt(2)] and [0, sqrt(2)]

HOW do you find out that (-sqrt(2), 0) is not defined?

Thanks for the read and help :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
calif2a8 said:
What is the domain of sqrt(2x-x^3)

I thought this would be pretty straight forward but I am completely stumped. So obviously square root is not defined for (-inf, 0), therefore I said:

2x-x^3 >= 0

Working this out you get x <= sqrt(2) as the domain.
You oversimplified things. I think this is what you did:
2x - x3 ≥ 0

x(2 - x2) ≥ 0 (so far, so good)

Next, it looks like you divided both sides by x - not good.

You need to factor the quadratic part, and you can't throw away the x factor as you did. Note that x = -2 is in the domain, which your work doesn't show.
calif2a8 said:
That is partially correct but I can't for the life of me get the rest of the answer.
The final answer is (-inf,-sqrt(2)] and [0, sqrt(2)]

HOW do you find out that (-sqrt(2), 0) is not defined?

Thanks for the read and help :D
 
Mark44 said:
You oversimplified things. I think this is what you did:


x(2 - x2) ≥ 0 (so far, so good)

Actually I did something worse i think, but I didn't know it was not correct? I started with

2x - x3 ≥ 0

but then I did this: 2x ≥ x3 and then canceled the Xs...
so then I was left with

2 ≥ x2 ... leading to my original answer of sqrt(2) ≥ x

Why is this approach wrong?

Thanks for all the replies by the way :)
 
calif2a8 said:
Actually I did something worse i think, but I didn't know it was not correct? I started with

2x - x3 ≥ 0

but then I did this: 2x ≥ x3 and then canceled the Xs...
so then I was left with

2 ≥ x2 ... leading to my original answer of sqrt(2) ≥ x

Why is this approach wrong?

Thanks for all the replies by the way :)

Dividing through by x before or after moving the x3 to the other side is an equivalent procedure.

What you should do is draw the graph of y=x^3-2x and notice where y>0. You should know that y=x(x^2-2) is the same graph. Now draw just y=x^2-2. Although the shape is completely different, the part where it crosses the x-axis at x=\pm\sqrt{2} is still the same with both graphs, but it's missing some extra information, such as it doesn't cross the x-axis at x=0.

Why's this? Well, when you divided x^3-2x by x, this assumes that x\neq 0 because you can't divide by zero, but x can be equal to zero, so you've changed the graph.

By the way, if x^2\leq 2 then the solution set for this inequality is [-2,2]. Again, draw the graph of y=x^2-2 and find where y<0.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top