Find the electric field at x and y coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a 60 μC point charge located at the origin, specifically at the coordinates (50 cm, 0 cm). Using Coulomb's Law and the formula for electric field, E = kQ/r², where k = 8.99 x 10⁹ N m²/C², the magnitude of the electric field was calculated to be approximately 2.1567 x 10⁶ N/C. The confusion arose regarding the differentiation between x and y components, ultimately clarified that the electric field vector points in the positive x-direction, resulting in a y-component of zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electric forces
  • Understanding of electric field calculations
  • Basic knowledge of vector components
  • Familiarity with unit conversions (microcoulombs to coulombs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field equations from Coulomb's Law
  • Learn about vector decomposition in physics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Investigate the effects of multiple point charges on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand electric field calculations and vector analysis in electrostatics.

jlmccart03
Messages
175
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


A 60 μC point charge is at the origin.
Find the electric field at the point x1 = 50 cm , y1 = 0.

Homework Equations


Coulombs Law: F = (kQ1Q2)/r2
Electric Field: E = kQ/r2
k = 8.99*109 C

The Attempt at a Solution


So taking Coulombs Law and deriving the Electric Field equation I then took my charge particle and set that equal to Q (First converting it from micro to full Coulombs), then taking the distance x and setting that equal to the r2 I put that in the denominator to finally solve for the Ex.

Note that k is 8.99*109

Finally I do the same thing with the y-component, but this is my issue. When I take the numbers and divide by 0 I get the infamous infinity.

So What Am I doing wrong here?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The r in the denominator is the total distance from the charge, and includes the contributions of both x and y offsets at the same time. This version of the Coulomb's law equation is a scalar version, yielding the magnitude of the electric field. It's up to you to assign the direction (i.e. break it into x and y components) as required.
 
gneill said:
The r in the denominator is the total distance from the charge, and includes the contributions of both x and y offsets at the same time. This version of the Coulomb's law equation is a scalar version, yielding the magnitude of the electric field. It's up to you to assign the direction (i.e. break it into x and y components) as required.
Wait so the answer I get when taking .5+.0 and squaring it is the same answer for both the x and y components? This is where I am starting to get confused.
 
jlmccart03 said:
Wait so the answer I get when taking .5+.0 and squaring it is the same answer for both the x and y components? This is where I am starting to get confused.
Yes. But think Pythagoras: ##r^2 = x^2 + y^2##.
 
gneill said:
Yes. But think Pythagoras: ##r^2 = x^2 + y^2##.

Ok so r2 = (0.5)2+02 = 0.25
Then taking this I simply get the equation (8.99*109*6*10-5)/0.25 = 2.1576*106.
So I guess I am confused again on how I differentiate between x and y components. Is it the same answer for both?
 
jlmccart03 said:
So I guess I am confused again on how I differentiate between x and y components. Is it the same answer for both?
What you have calculated is the magnitude of the electric field (be sure to include the units!). You need to break that into x and y components depending upon the direction of the vector it's associated with. This case is pretty simple given the direction of the electric field vector at the location you were given.
 
gneill said:
What you have calculated is the magnitude of the electric field (be sure to include the units!). You need to break that into x and y components depending upon the direction of the vector it's associated with. This case is pretty simple given the direction of the electric field vector at the location you were given.
Ok, so I get 2.1567*106 N/C and since initially x = 50 cm or 0.5 m and y = 0 cm or 0 m then my x-component is 2.1567*106 N/C in the positive x-direction, and 2.1567*106 N/C in the positive y-direction? I might be confusing myself.
 
jlmccart03 said:
Ok, so I get 2.1567*106 N/C and since initially x = 50 cm or 0.5 m and y = 0 cm or 0 m then my x-component is 2.1567*106 N/m in the positive x-direction, and 2.1567*106 in the positive y-direction? I might be confusing myself.
You are definitely confusing yourself :smile: If you were to sketch the E vector on a diagram that shows the charge and the location in question on XY axes, what direction would it point?
 
gneill said:
You are definitely confusing yourself :smile: If you were to sketch the E vector on a diagram that shows the charge and the location in question on XY axes, what direction would it point?
It would point to the right. Correct? The charge is positive and the E vector is positive so they would be repulsive.
 
  • #10
jlmccart03 said:
It would point to the right correct since the charge is positive and the E vector is positive they would be repulsive.
Well, the E vector doesn't have a sign per se, but yes, it would point to the right in the +x direction. What does that tell you about the magnitude of the y-component for such a vector?
 
  • #11
gneill said:
Well, the E vector doesn't have a sign per se, but yes, it would point to the right in the +x direction. What does that tell you about the magnitude of the y-component for such a vector?
The y vector magnitude is 0 since it does not point in either direction on the y-axis.
 
  • #12
jlmccart03 said:
The y vector magnitude is 0 since it does not point in either direction on the y-axis.
Correct. So the x-component must account for the entire magnitude of the vector.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Correct. So the x-component must account for the entire magnitude of the vector.
Thank you so much for sticking with me! That was my entire issue was the y-component and once I drew a sketch then it just pieced together. Thanks again!
 
  • #14
Cheers! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
825
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K