Find the Equation of a Line with Undefined Slope Passing Through (-1,4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter recoil33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Slope
recoil33
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Question:

Determine the equation the line passing through (-1,4) with undefined(infinite) slope.

I put "y=-1"

This was because if it was constant there would be a undefined slope?

Altough, it was obviously wrong.

Help please?

[Wrong section if possible get moved to homework]
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you draw this line on a coordinate system you will get a vertical line passing through all y values when x=-1.

So x=-1 regardless of the y value, therefore the equation is x=-1

Let's generalize:

The equation of a vertical line passing through (a,b) will be x=a

You should also note that a vertical line does not represent a function because a function must match no more than one y value for any given x value. A vertical line matches infinite y values for one x value so it is not a function.
 
I noticed i did a simple mistake of accidently thinking of y=-1, and x=-1, for some reason was thinking on the wrong axis.

Thanks for the help
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top