Find the error in this paragraph about physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter 8parks11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Physics
8parks11
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
the universe is in an ever-ending cosmos which is defined by the natural laws of physics and mathematics, its shape is an ellipse that grows, ellipse has a constant which makes is a circle, how ever, things are not 1-dimensional. so we are in a sphrical demision (3d)...sphere contains NO CORNER...
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
I don't believe there's any point in trying to find any errors in the paragraph. It'd be much harder to find anything that's correct. I don't even know where you got this, but it's nonsense.

- Warren
 
Not even wrong?
 
What happened to the math? I refuse to accept that argument without any math. In fact, I find it annoying.
 
Find the error in this paragraph about physics
It must be the word physics, cause that's what it definitely isn't.
 
EL said:
It must be the word physics, cause that's what it definitely isn't.

I think that sums this thread up pretty well.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
528
Replies
47
Views
641
Replies
2
Views
140
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top