Find the oc voltage and the voltage across the 5 ohm load

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue_tiger30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Ohm Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and the voltage across a 5-ohm load (VL) using three methods: Direct Approach, Thévenin's Theorem, and Nodal Analysis. The user successfully calculated Voc as 98.63 e^-j3.38 and VL as 98.45 e^-j6.810 using the Direct Approach. However, discrepancies arose in the results obtained from the Thévenin and Nodal Analysis methods, leading to confusion regarding the calculations. The community provided insights into correcting the Nodal Analysis approach and confirmed that the results from different methods should align when calculated correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex impedance in AC circuits
  • Familiarity with Thévenin's Theorem for circuit simplification
  • Proficiency in Nodal Analysis for circuit analysis
  • Ability to perform calculations in polar and rectangular forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of complex impedance and its application in AC circuits
  • Study Thévenin's Theorem in detail, focusing on practical examples
  • Practice Nodal Analysis with various circuit configurations to enhance understanding
  • Learn to convert between polar and rectangular forms for complex numbers
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in AC circuit analysis and voltage calculations.

blue_tiger30
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3405118/24-02-2013%2018-46-54.png

Find (a) the open-circuit voltage VL , and (b) the voltage across the 5 ohm load, by the following methods.

Method 1: Direct approach. First find the open circuit voltage by simple ‘potential divider’ approach
(but with complex impedances Z replacing the simple resistances we used under d.c. conditions). Then
find the equivalent series impedance of the two parallel branches on the right, and again use the ‘potential
divider’ idea to find VL. The calculations are lengthy, and you will probably find it best to use polar form
for the multiplications and divisions.Method 2: Thévenin. Find the Thévenin equivalent circuit for the transformer and 100 V supply. Then
apply the load and use the potential divider approach.
Method 3: Nodal Analysis. Call the node at the top of j35 node a and that at the top of the 5  load
node b, with the reference (zero) node at the bottom. Write down the nodal equations in terms of the
complex impedances, and solve for Vb.no drawings required

The Attempt at a Solution



I did method one and got the answer to be : Voc :98.63 e^-j3.38 , VL: 98.45 e^-j6.810

and tried to do the rest but I couldn't get the same answer can some one explain how do we the same answer for method 2 and 3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
blue_tiger30 said:

Homework Statement


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3405118/24-02-2013%2018-46-54.png

Find (a) the open-circuit voltage VL , and (b) the voltage across the 5 ohm load, by the following methods.

Method 1: Direct approach. First find the open circuit voltage by simple ‘potential divider’ approach
(but with complex impedances Z replacing the simple resistances we used under d.c. conditions). Then
find the equivalent series impedance of the two parallel branches on the right, and again use the ‘potential
divider’ idea to find VL. The calculations are lengthy, and you will probably find it best to use polar form
for the multiplications and divisions.


Method 2: Thévenin. Find the Thévenin equivalent circuit for the transformer and 100 V supply. Then
apply the load and use the potential divider approach.
Method 3: Nodal Analysis. Call the node at the top of j35 node a and that at the top of the 5  load
node b, with the reference (zero) node at the bottom. Write down the nodal equations in terms of the
complex impedances, and solve for Vb.


no drawings required


The Attempt at a Solution



I did method one and got the answer to be : Voc :98.63 e^-j3.38 , VL: 98.45 e^-j6.810

and tried to do the rest but I couldn't get the same answer can some one explain how do we the same answer for method 2 and 3
Hi blue_tiger30, Welcome to Physics Forums.

How do you know that the result you obtained by method 1 is correct? Did you get different values for both methods 2 and 3?

Can you show more detail of your work for method 1 so that we can check it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
in the start I replaced the resistances that I got into a complex impedance z = ((5+j0.3)*j35))/(j35+4(5+j0.3)=4.818+j0.9804ohm
I=v/(z+j0.3)
Voc=z*I=v*(z/(z+j0.3))= 98.63 e^-3.38
V across R = I*5=(Voc/(5+j0.3))*5= 98.45 e^-j6.810
I think this is th right answer becuse I UNDERSTAND THIS METHOD
but for the rest I did as follows :
The Thevenin equivalent is
a voltage source = 100(j35/(j35 +j0.3)= 100(j35/j35.3) = 99.15 volts, this is the open circuit voltage
in series with R thevenin = j0.3 + (j0.3)(j35)/(j0.3 + j35) = j0.597Ω

The voltage across RL is 99.15( 5/(5 + j0.597)) = 97.76 -j11.67 volts

Nodal analysis
Node A: (100 - Va)/(j0.3) = Va/(j35) + (Va - Vb)/(j0.3)
100/j0.3 = 2Va/j0.3 + Va/j35 - Vb/j0.3
100 = 2Va + Va(0.3/35) - Vb = Va( 2.0086) -Vb

Node B: (Va - Vb)/(j0.3) = Vb/5
Va/j0.3 = Vb/j0.3 + Vb/5
Va = Vb + Vb(j0.3/5) = Vb( 1 +j0.06)

100 = (Vb(1 +j0.06)(2.0086) -Vb = Vb(1.0086 + j0.121)
Vb = 100/(1.0086 +j0.121) = (100.86 - j12.1)/1.016 = 99.3 -j11.9 volts

which give me different answers and sice I m not that good at these methods I thinks that I did them in the wrong way
 
blue_tiger30 said:
in the start I replaced the resistances that I got into a complex impedance z = ((5+j0.3)*j35))/(j35+4(5+j0.3)=4.818+j0.9804ohm
I=v/(z+j0.3)
Voc=z*I=v*(z/(z+j0.3))= 98.63 e^-3.38
V across R = I*5=(Voc/(5+j0.3))*5= 98.45 e^-j6.810
I think this is th right answer becuse I UNDERSTAND THIS METHOD
Okay, looks good.
but for the rest I did as follows :
The Thevenin equivalent is
a voltage source = 100(j35/(j35 +j0.3)= 100(j35/j35.3) = 99.15 volts, this is the open circuit voltage
in series with R thevenin = j0.3 + (j0.3)(j35)/(j0.3 + j35) = j0.597Ω

The voltage across RL is 99.15( 5/(5 + j0.597)) = 97.76 -j11.67 volts
Yes, your Thevenin components look fine, and your result for the load voltage looks good.
Nodal analysis
Node A: (100 - Va)/(j0.3) = Va/(j35) + (Va - Vb)/(j0.3)
100/j0.3 = 2Va/j0.3 + Va/j35 - Vb/j0.3
100 = 2Va + Va(0.3/35) - Vb = Va( 2.0086) -Vb

Node B: (Va - Vb)/(j0.3) = Vb/5
Va/j0.3 = Vb/j0.3 + Vb/5
Va = Vb + Vb(j0.3/5) = Vb( 1 +j0.06)

100 = (Vb(1 +j0.06)(2.0086) -Vb = Vb(1.0086 + j0.121)
Vb = 100/(1.0086 +j0.121) = (100.86 - j12.1)/1.016 = 99.3 -j11.9 volts

which give me different answers and sice I m not that good at these methods I thinks that I did them in the wrong way
Your "Direct Approach" and Thevenin methods both look fine, but things have gone wrong with your Nodal Analysis.

When doing Nodal Analysis you should first choose a reference node which is defined to have zero potential, then identify the independent nodes. It doesn't look like you've done this. The circuit has only two nodes of interest: a and b. The rest of the junctions lie along series connected branches. Which one will you take to be the reference node?
 
so for method 2 shouldn't the answer be = to the answer I got in method one ? can u please tell me what went wrong there ?

to be honest I don't really get nodal analysis I only know how to do loop analysis but that's not what he asked for in this homework so If you could correct my steps if possible

many thanks for your help
 
blue_tiger30 said:
so for method 2 shouldn't the answer be = to the answer I got in method one ? can u please tell me what went wrong there ?
The answers are the same; one is expressed in polar form, the other in rectangular form :wink:
to be honest I don't really get nodal analysis I only know how to do loop analysis but that's not what he asked for in this homework so If you could correct my steps if possible

Your node equations look fine, but in the simultaneous solving of them something went wrong. So check your math in the last two lines.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K