Find the remainder of a division

pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Hi all!

Could anyone help telling me the way to find the remainder of the following divisions:

1. (x^2006+x^1996+x^1981+x+1):(x^2-1)

2. (x2+x3+x5+1) : [(x-1)(x-2)]

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Saying that "P(x) divided by U(x) is equal to quotient Q(x) with remainder R(x) means that P(x)= U(x)*Q(x)+ R(x)." Of course, R(x) has lower degree than U(x) so that, for example, if U is linear, then R(x)= r, a number. In both of your examples, U(x) is quadratic so R(x) is linear. It is also true that, if U(a)= 0 then P(a)= R(a).

So: for the first problem, Q(x)= x2- 1 which has zeroes 1 and -1. You know that the remainder is a linear function, R(x)= ax+ b, such that R(1)= 1^2006+1^1996+1^1981+1+1= ? and R(-1)= (-1)^2006+(-1)^1996+(-1)^1981+(-1)+1= ?. Two points are sufficient to determine a and b. Same idea for the second problem.
 
HallsofIvy said:
...
So: for the first problem, Q(x)= x2- 1 which has zeroes 1 and -1. You know that the remainder is a linear function, R(x)= ax+ b, such that R(1)= 1^2006+1^1996+1^1981+1+1= ? and R(-1)= (-1)^2006+(-1)^1996+(-1)^1981+(-1)+1= ?. Two points are sufficient to determine a and b. Same idea for the second problem.


There may be a mistake in your reasoning. U(x) equals x^2-1 which has two roots at 1 and -1, not Q(x).
 
There is a typo in his reasoning, not a mistake. Substitute Q(x) with U(x) in Hall's write-up. It doesn't matter what Q(x) is. It is just some polynomial. If U(x) is zero for some particular value of x, the product Q(x)*U(x) will also be zero at that value of x.

For a polynomial divided by a quadratic, you know that the remainder R(x) must be of the form ax+b. Since P(x) = Q(x)*U(x) + R(x), P(x) and R(X) must be equal at the zeros of U(x). Evaluating P(x) at the the zeros of U(x) provides the information needed to deduce the form of R(x).
 
Oh, now I've got to the point:
P(x) - R(x)=U(x).Q(x)
At x=1 and x=-1, the left-hand side equals zero ..

Thank you HallsofIvy and DH.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top