Find the velocity (in a simple and timely manner)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Narroo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Narroo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm preparing for the GRE, and I've encountered a practice problem that I can solve, but not in a manner practical for the test.

Homework Statement



Two spaceships approach Earth with equal speeds,
as measured by an observer on Earth, but from
opposite directions. A meterstick on one spaceship
is measured to be 60 cm long by an occupant
of the other spaceship. What is the speed of each
spaceship, as measured by the observer on Earth?
(A) 0.4c
(B) 0.5c
(C) 0.6c
(D) 0.7c
(E) 0.8c


Well, the problem seems easy. And it is: Start with length contraction followed by Einstein Velocity Addition:

Homework Equations



Length Contraction
\acute{d}=\frac{d}{\gamma}

Einstein Velocity Addition
\acute{V}=\frac{V_{1}+V_{2}}{1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{C^{2}}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I did what you would expect. I first solved for the velocity of the two spaceships relative to each other. This gives 0.8c. But, you need the speed of the ship relative to the Earth! So I used the addition formula. This gives 0.5c, which is the correct answer!

So, the problem? This is a GRE question. I don't have a calculator or that much time to solve the question.

When you do the math, After a fair amount of algebraic manipulation, the final equation looks like this:
v^{4}+2(1-2 \frac{d^{2}}{\acute{d^{2}}})v^{2}+1=0

And that's before throwing in the quadratic equation!

Of course, you can just calculate \acute{v} and just solve
\acute{V}=\frac{2v}{1+\frac{v^{2}}{C^{2}}}, but that still ends in a quadratic equation and a lot of arithmetic. It's not a practical solution.

I've tried manipulating the equations to create a simple, easy, equation to solve, to no luck. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess:
The contraction factor from ship1 to ship2 is the product of the contraction factor from ship1 to Earth and the contraction factor from Earth to ship2.
Isn't it?
To be checked.
 
maajdl said:
My guess:
The contraction factor from ship1 to ship2 is the product of the contraction factor from ship1 to Earth and the contraction factor from Earth to ship2.
Isn't it?
To be checked.

Why would that be?
 
Hi Narroo! On the physics GRE you don't have to get every question correct, it's probably best to find all the ones you can do quickly and easily first and then leave ones like this until last.

But if you can remember the formula for \gamma and the velocity addition formula, this one shouldn't take you more than 2-3 minutes.

Narroo said:
Well, I did what you would expect. I first solved for the velocity of the two spaceships relative to each other. This gives 0.8c.

I agree - you know that \gamma = \frac{5}{3} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} so \beta = \frac{4}{5}.

(it's a 3-4-5 triangle)

[1 minute so far]

But, you need the speed of the ship relative to the Earth! So I used the addition formula. This gives 0.5c, which is the correct answer!

Again I agree, you just solve \frac{2\beta}{1 + \beta^2} = \frac{4}{5} for \beta, \beta = \frac{1}{2}.

[2 minutes total :smile:]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top