Find the velocity (in a simple and timely manner)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Narroo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a GRE physics problem involving two spaceships approaching Earth with equal speeds. The key concepts include length contraction and Einstein's velocity addition, which lead to the correct answer of 0.5c for the speed of each spaceship relative to Earth. Participants express concerns about the practicality of solving such problems under timed conditions without a calculator, highlighting the complexity of the algebra involved. Suggestions are made to focus on simpler methods or shortcuts to arrive at the answer more efficiently. The consensus emphasizes the importance of quickly identifying solvable problems during the GRE.
Narroo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm preparing for the GRE, and I've encountered a practice problem that I can solve, but not in a manner practical for the test.

Homework Statement



Two spaceships approach Earth with equal speeds,
as measured by an observer on Earth, but from
opposite directions. A meterstick on one spaceship
is measured to be 60 cm long by an occupant
of the other spaceship. What is the speed of each
spaceship, as measured by the observer on Earth?
(A) 0.4c
(B) 0.5c
(C) 0.6c
(D) 0.7c
(E) 0.8c


Well, the problem seems easy. And it is: Start with length contraction followed by Einstein Velocity Addition:

Homework Equations



Length Contraction
\acute{d}=\frac{d}{\gamma}

Einstein Velocity Addition
\acute{V}=\frac{V_{1}+V_{2}}{1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{C^{2}}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I did what you would expect. I first solved for the velocity of the two spaceships relative to each other. This gives 0.8c. But, you need the speed of the ship relative to the Earth! So I used the addition formula. This gives 0.5c, which is the correct answer!

So, the problem? This is a GRE question. I don't have a calculator or that much time to solve the question.

When you do the math, After a fair amount of algebraic manipulation, the final equation looks like this:
v^{4}+2(1-2 \frac{d^{2}}{\acute{d^{2}}})v^{2}+1=0

And that's before throwing in the quadratic equation!

Of course, you can just calculate \acute{v} and just solve
\acute{V}=\frac{2v}{1+\frac{v^{2}}{C^{2}}}, but that still ends in a quadratic equation and a lot of arithmetic. It's not a practical solution.

I've tried manipulating the equations to create a simple, easy, equation to solve, to no luck. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess:
The contraction factor from ship1 to ship2 is the product of the contraction factor from ship1 to Earth and the contraction factor from Earth to ship2.
Isn't it?
To be checked.
 
maajdl said:
My guess:
The contraction factor from ship1 to ship2 is the product of the contraction factor from ship1 to Earth and the contraction factor from Earth to ship2.
Isn't it?
To be checked.

Why would that be?
 
Hi Narroo! On the physics GRE you don't have to get every question correct, it's probably best to find all the ones you can do quickly and easily first and then leave ones like this until last.

But if you can remember the formula for \gamma and the velocity addition formula, this one shouldn't take you more than 2-3 minutes.

Narroo said:
Well, I did what you would expect. I first solved for the velocity of the two spaceships relative to each other. This gives 0.8c.

I agree - you know that \gamma = \frac{5}{3} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} so \beta = \frac{4}{5}.

(it's a 3-4-5 triangle)

[1 minute so far]

But, you need the speed of the ship relative to the Earth! So I used the addition formula. This gives 0.5c, which is the correct answer!

Again I agree, you just solve \frac{2\beta}{1 + \beta^2} = \frac{4}{5} for \beta, \beta = \frac{1}{2}.

[2 minutes total :smile:]
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top