MHB Find x for Geometric Progression: Solve with Step-by-Step Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric Sequence
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Find the value of x such that the following sequence forms a geometric progression...?
x-1, 3x+4, 6x+8...so i am suppose to solve this by this rule: a,b,c then b^2=ac but I am just going around in circles because i have no idea how to get an answer, my textbook says the answer is -6, but i want to know the working out...any answers appreciated!
thanks in advance:)

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sequence $x-1, 3x+4, 6x+8$ forms a a geometric progression if and only if:
$$\frac{3x+4}{x-1}=\frac{6x+8}{3x+4}\text{ and } x-1\neq 0\text{ and }3x+4\neq 0$$
Solving the equation
$$3x^2+22x+24=0\Leftrightarrow\ldots \Leftrightarrow x=-6\text{ or }x=-4/3$$
But $x=-4/3$ is not a valid solution (satisfies $3x+4=0$), so the solution is $x=-6$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top