Finding a Convergent Sequence with a Limit of 1

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 3K views
DPMachine
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give an example of a sequence [tex](a_n)[/tex] so that [tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \left|a_{n+1}/a_{n}\right| =1[/tex] and [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] converges

Homework Equations



(Maybe relevant, maybe not)
Theorem which states:

If [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] converges, then [tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a_{n} =0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble coming up with [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] that converges...

Since [tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a_{n} =0[/tex] doesn't imply the convergence of [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] (the theorem only works the other way around), I'm not sure where to start.

Any hint will be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DPMachine said:
I'm having trouble coming up with [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] that converges...
You can certainly come up with some converging sum, ignoring the other requirement for a moment?

[tex]a_n=\frac{1}{n}[/tex] satisfies [tex]\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|\to 1[/tex], but [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] does not converge. Can you modify this example such that it does?
 
Landau said:
You can certainly come up with some converging sum, ignoring the other requirement for a moment?

[tex]a_n=\frac{1}{n}[/tex] satisfies [tex]\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|\to 1[/tex], but [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] does not converge. Can you modify this example such that it does?

Sorry, I don't think my question was clear. I'm having trouble understanding what makes certain partial sums converge/not converge.

So yeah, [tex]a_n=\frac{1}{n}[/tex] does satisfy [tex]\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|\to 1[/tex], but why wouldn't [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} a_{n}[/tex] converge? Isn't [tex]1/n[/tex] approaching zero?
 
The purpose of this exercise seems to be exploring the edge case of the ratio test. For the terms in an infinite series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], you look at the limit
[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{a_{n + 1}}{a_n}\right|~=~L[/tex]
If L < 1, the series converges absolutely.
If L > 1, the series diverges.
If L = 1, or no limit exists, the test is inconclusive.

This problem seems to be about that third possibility, where L = 1.
 
Mark44 said:
The purpose of this exercise seems to be exploring the edge case of the ratio test. For the terms in an infinite series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], you look at the limit
[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{a_{n + 1}}{a_n}\right|~=~L[/tex]
If L < 1, the series converges absolutely.
If L > 1, the series diverges.
If L = 1, or no limit exists, the test is inconclusive.

This problem seems to be about that third possibility, where L = 1.

Okay, I think I understand it... so if L=1, it's possible for [tex]\sum a_{n}[/tex] to either converge or diverge.

So, for example, when [tex]a_{n}[/tex] is an alternating harmonic series (from the wiki article above):
1c17b395c60e0e044a7235fc4dcc6915.png


then [tex]\sum a_{n}[/tex] would converge and also have L=1.

On the other hand, if [tex]a_{n}[/tex] is something like [tex]a_{1}=1, a_{n+1}=a_{n}[/tex] so that [tex](a_{n}) = (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, ...)[/tex]

then [tex]\sum a_{n}[/tex] does not converge (since it goes to infinity) but still have L=1.

Is that right?