Finding a matrix representation for operator A

Msilva
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I need to find a matrix representation for operator A=x\frac{d}{dx} using Legendre polinomials as base.
I would use a_{mn}=\int^{-1}_{-1}P_m(x)\,x\frac{d}{dx}\,P_n(x)\,dx, but I have the problem that Legendre polinomials aren't orthonormal \langle P_{i}|P_{l}\rangle=\delta_{il}\frac{2}{2i+1}.

I don't know if I must mutiply the integral of the a_{mn} terms by the norm, because I have terms in n and m order.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have some remarks, to kick things off:
  • To let other help you better, it may be a good idea to specify the Hilbert space ##H## (including a definition of the inner product) on which ##A## acts and the domain ##D(A)## of ##A##.
  • If, for example, ##H = L^2(-1,1)## with the standard inner product, then the (normalized) Legendre polynomials that I know form an orthonormal basis of ##H##.
  • It has always remained somewhat of a mystery to me why physicists (I presume you are one?) insist on representing unbounded operators as matrices.
 
-
Msilva said:
I need to find a matrix representation for operator A=x\frac{d}{dx} using Legendre polinomials as base.
I would use a_{mn}=\int^{-1}_{-1}P_m(x)\,x\frac{d}{dx}\,P_n(x)\,dx,
Did you mean ##a_{mn}=\int^{+1}_{-1}P_m(x)\,x\frac{d}{dx}\,P_n(x)\,dx##?
Msilva said:
but I have the problem that Legendre polinomials aren't orthonormal \langle P_{i}|P_{l}\rangle=\delta_{il}\frac{2}{2i+1}.

I don't know if I must mutiply the integral of the a_{mn} terms by the norm, because I have terms in n and m order.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top