Finding a Minimum Value for a Continuous Function on a Compact Set

  • Thread starter Thread starter trap101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property
trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Suppose S\subsetℝn is compact, f: S-->R is continous, and f(x)>0 for every x \inS. Show that there is a number c>0 such that f(x) ≥ c for every x\inS.
Attempt:
Since S is contained in Rn is compact, then S is closed and bounded.
By the extreme value thm there exists values a,b that are an absolute minimum and absolute maximum respectively. Let c = f(a). Therefore by EVT f(c) ≤ f(x) in R.Well I have the solution manual and their solution is way different to what I attempted. Is there anything right about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is correct. You might want to explain why c>0 however.
 
trap101 said:
Therefore by EVT f(c) ≤ f(x) in R.

Also, this should be c≤f(x).
 
micromass said:
Also, this should be c≤f(x).

But isn't c \in S. SO wouldn't the function map c to f(c)?


micromass said:
Your solution is correct. You might want to explain why c>0 however.


Is the fact c having to be positive because if c < 0 ==> f(a) < f(c) ?
 
trap101 said:
But isn't c \in S. SO wouldn't the function map c to f(c)?

You defined c=f(a). So c is an element of f(S)\subseteq \mathbb{R}. Writing f(c) makes no sense.

Is the fact c having to be positive because if c < 0 ==> f(a) < f(c) ?

Again, f(c) makes no sense.
 
got it now, thanks foe the help.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top