Finding a solution for Relativistic Acceleration

Michio Cuckoo
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
I tried all my mathcad software such as Maple and I can't seem to find a solution to this time based differential equation.

m}\left%20(%201%20-%20\frac{\left%20[%20f(t)%20\right%20]^{2}}{c^{2}}%20\right%20)^{\frac{3}{2}}.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michio Cuckoo said:
I tried all my mathcad software such as Maple and I can't seem to find a solution to this time based differential equation.

m}\left%20(%201%20-%20\frac{\left%20[%20f(t)%20\right%20]^{2}}{c^{2}}%20\right%20)^{\frac{3}{2}}.gif

Solving differential equations is often a matter of guessing and checking.
This equation comes up in Rindler coordinates, so I actually know the solution.

Let g = F/m.
Switch to a new independent variable T that is related to t through
t = c/g sinh(gT/c).

Then try the solution:

f = c tanh(gT/c)

In terms of the original t, we can rewrite f as

f = c (gt/c)/√(1 + (gt/c)2)

or

f = c (ct)/√((ct)2 + c2/g)
 
Solving differential equations is often a matter of guessing and checking.
Michio, It's important part of everyone's physics education to pick up some standard techniques for solving DEs, so you don't have to depend entirely on the math software to do it for you, which often does an imperfect job. And this equation is a very easy one to solve. Setting the constant parameters to one to simplify the discussion,

df/dt = (1 - f2)3/2

Separate the variables (t on one side, f on the other) and integrate immediately:

t = ∫(1 - f2)-3/2 df

To do the integral, the factor 1 - f2 suggests making a trig substitution. Let f = sin θ.

t = ∫(cos θ)-3 cos θ dθ = ∫ sec2 θ dθ = tan θ

So we have f = sin θ, t = tan θ, giving us an algebraic relationship and the solution:

t = f/√(1 - f2) or f = t/√(1 + t2)
 
Bill_K said:
t = ∫(1 - f2)-3/2 df

To do the integral, the factor 1 - f2 suggests making a trig substitution. Let f = sin θ.

Interestingly, it works to try the substitution f = sin(θ), then you get t = tan(θ), but it also works to try the substitution f = tanh(θ), then you get t = sinh(θ). I like the latter better, because that gets you to the Rindler coordinates.
 
sin θ = tanh χ
cos θ = sech χ
tan θ = sinh χ

is known as the Gudermannian transformation and written θ = gd χ. See "Gudermannian Function" in Wikipedia.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top