Finding a vector perpendicular to two vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a vector that is perpendicular to two given vectors, V and W, defined in three-dimensional space. The vectors are V = 3i + 2j - 2k and W = 4i - 3j + k. Participants are exploring the concept of the cross product as a method to determine this perpendicular vector.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the cross product of vectors V and W to find the perpendicular vector, with some expressing confusion about the method and its application to more complex vectors. There are attempts to clarify the properties of vector multiplication and the significance of the dot product in relation to perpendicularity.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various methods being proposed for calculating the cross product. Some participants are questioning their understanding of the operations involved, while others are confirming that different approaches to the cross product can yield valid results. There is no explicit consensus on a single method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the vectors involved and the challenge of visualizing the perpendicular vector in three-dimensional space. There is also mention of the non-commutative nature of the vector product, which adds to the discussion's depth.

Kevin2341
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A vector perpendicular to both vectors V & W
Vector V = 3i + 2j - 2k
Vector W = 4i -3j + k


Homework Equations


Cross product equation



The Attempt at a Solution


The way our teacher tried to teach us was to do the cross product of vectors V x W
Which supposedly equals (area of parallelogram)n-hat (or carrot, what ever you call unit vectors).

But the only example my teacher did this was for an extremely simple set of vectors dealing only with the i and j components and no k component. So basically she went and did V x W for this extremely simple vector problem, and when she chose her perpendicular vector to both V and W, she took a shortcut and just choose k to be the perpendicular vector, which makes perfect sense because it is so simple, but it doesn't help us at all when it comes to trying to do more complex variations of this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vector V = 3i + 2j - 2k
Vector W = 4i -3j + k

I think you can just multiply them as you would scalar numbers, just keeping in mind
i × j = k
j × k = i
k × i = j
i × i = j × j = k × k = 0

so you would get
(3i + 2j - 2k)(4i -3j + k)
12(0) + (3i)(-3j) + ... + (-2)(0)

I hope I'm remembering this correctly and not providing you with wrong information
 
Oh also for the work I have done so far...

I calculated the area of my parallelogram created by the two vectors to be ||V x W||, so its a scalar value, which makes sense. But where I am getting stuck is where to begin with finding the perpendicular vector, I can't just choose a vector going off in a straight component direction because the vectors sort of make a down-ward facing V shape which is at a slant (left side is 2 units higher than right side). So I know that this vector is shooting off in some direction. I can imagine it really easy in my head, its just being able to come up with an actual vector that I'm stuck with, because I have nothing to work with, at least that I know of.
 
smk037 said:
Vector V = 3i + 2j - 2k
Vector W = 4i -3j + k

I think you can just multiply them as you would scalar numbers, just keeping in mind
i × j = k
j × k = i
k × i = j
i × i = j × j = k × k = 0

so you would get
(3i + 2j - 2k)(4i -3j + k)
12(0) + (3i)(-3j) + ... + (-2)(0)

I hope I'm remembering this correctly and not providing you with wrong information

Hmm, okay so the vector you came up with is 14i - 6j - 2k, which can be reduced to 7i - 3j - k

But as I remember, is a vector is perpendicular to another vector, their dot product = 0. Using this vector you just calculated, neither V or W = 0 when DP'ed with the perpendicular vector (lets call it P)
 
Don't forget, the vector product is not commutative: a x b = - b x a. So

i × j = k, j × i = -k
j × k = i, k × j = -i
k × i = j, i × k = -j

ehild
 
ehild said:
Don't forget, the vector product is not commutative: a x b = - b x a. So

i × j = k, j × i = -k
j × k = i, k × j = -i
k × i = j, i × k = -j

ehild

Okay, I got to ask, are you guys doing the Cross Product here? Because I haven't ever seen these things before. For cross products we use determinates

so you have
|..i...j...k...|
|xi(1) yj(1) zk(1)|
|xi(2) yj(2) zk(2)|

= (yj(1)zk(2) - yj(2)zk(1))i - (xi(1)zk(2) - xi(2)zk(1))j - (xi(1)yj(2) - xi(2)zk(1))k
 
Yes they are doing cross products. You can do them several ways (your way is correct too).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K