Finding acceleration of two objects in a pulley system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of two blocks in a pulley system, considering forces such as applied force, gravitational force, and friction. The user derived equations for both blocks, but there is a concern about the inclusion of friction forces acting on the lower block from both the surface and the upper block. It is clarified that both friction forces must be accounted for in the equations to accurately determine the net force and acceleration. Additionally, the normal forces acting on the lower block need to reflect the weights of both blocks, not just the lower one. Properly adjusting these factors is essential for solving the problem accurately.
kathyt.25
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"In the diagram shown below, the lower block is acted on by a force, F, which has a magnitude of 74.4 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the surface is 0.269. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the upper block is also 0.269. What is the acceleration of the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 3.27 kg and the mass of the upper block is 2.02 kg?"

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/kathy_felldown/kn-pic0828.png

I think I understand the system and the forces involved, and I was able to come up with the equations and substitute them, can someone just verify that my methods are correct?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


For object m2, on the bottom:
Fnet(x) = n2 - m2*g = 0 --> n2 = m2*g
Fnet(y) = Fa - u*n2 - T = ma --> T = Fa - u*n2 - m2*a [EQUATION #1]

For object m1, on the top:
Fnet(x) = n1 - m1*g = 0 --> n1 = m1*g
Fnet(y) = T - u*n1 = m1*a --> T = m1*a + u*n1 [EQUATION #2]

Substitute m1*g for n1 and m2*g for n2, then...
Equate equation #1 to equation #2 and isolate for acceleration, "a", so that:
a = Fa - u*g(m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2)
Since the two objects are connected in the pulley system, their accelerations will be the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your Fnet(x)'s (where it seems you have x-axis running vertically).

However, check your freebody diagram's again. There are two friction forces working an the bottom block (top and bottom). It looks to me like you left one out of the equation.
 
Chrisas said:
However, check your freebody diagram's again. There are two friction forces working an the bottom block (top and bottom). It looks to me like you left one out of the equation.

Why would both friction forces be affecting the bottom block? Isn't it just the friction on the surface that the bottom block is sliding on (as in the ground) that affects its movement?
 
It goes something like this: Newton said for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction (or something along those lines, too lazy to look it up).

If a friction force is being generated on the top block by the motion of the bottom block, then the bottom block feels an equal but opposite reaction from the top block.

Another way to think of it is to imagine sitting on the top block. You see yourself moving across the bottom block and friction force is being generated to oppose your motion. Now imagine sitting on the bottom block. Not only do you see yourself moving across the floor with a friction force opposing your motion, but you also see a top block moving on top of you also with friction opposing your motion.

Hmm...now that I think of it, I think we both forgot that in the vertical direction on the bottom block you need to have the floor normal force upwards, the gravity force downwards, and, another normal force pointing upwards (EDIT: Ack downwards I mean - need sleep) that is equal and opposite to the normal force of the top block. The floor normal force should come out to be equal to the weight of both blocks. But right now in your equation, it only equals the weight of the bottom block.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K