Finding acceleration with Kinetic Friction coefficient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of two boxes being raised by a crane on a tilted plank, with a focus on the effects of kinetic friction. The problem involves understanding forces acting on the boxes, including gravitational force, frictional force, and the net force resulting from these interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of forces acting on the boxes, including gravitational components and friction. There are discussions about the role of the crane's force and whether it contributes to the acceleration of the boxes. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the crane's operation, such as whether it is lifting at a constant speed.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and calculations. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the calculation of normal and frictional forces. There is no explicit consensus on the assumptions about the crane's force or the setup of the problem, indicating a productive exploration of different interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of detailed information about the crane's operation and the setup of the problem, which may affect the calculations. The angle of the plank and the weights of the boxes are specified, but there is uncertainty about the applied forces and their implications for the acceleration of the boxes.

phee
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At a construction site, a small crane is raising two boxes of nails on a plank to the roof. One box has already been opened and is half full, while the other box is new. The boxes, including the nails, weigh 10kg (box 1) and 20kg (box 2), respectively and are both the same size.

If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.3, how fast will the boxes accelerate along the plank, once they start to slide?

This is for box 1:

m=10kg
Uk = 0.3
Weight = 10kg x 9.8 = 98 N
angle = 22

Homework Equations



Fnet = m/a
Fgx = mg(sin22)


The Attempt at a Solution



So so far I am trying to find the net force, so I concluded I needed to find Fgx

Fgx = mg(sin22) = 37 N

F(kinetic force) = -0.3(mg) = -29.4




I am not finished but was wondering if someone could at least hint to me as if I am going in the right direction. This has been confusing me for the past hour.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phee said:

Homework Statement



At a construction site, a small crane is raising two boxes of nails on a plank to the roof. One box has already been opened and is half full, while the other box is new. The boxes, including the nails, weigh 10kg (box 1) and 20kg (box 2), respectively and are both the same size.

If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.3, how fast will the boxes accelerate along the plank, once they start to slide?

This is for box 1:

m=10kg
Uk = 0.3
Weight = 10kg x 9.8 = 98 N
angle = 22

Homework Equations



Fnet = m/a
Fgx = mg(sin22)

The Attempt at a Solution



So so far I am trying to find the net force, so I concluded I needed to find Fgx

Fgx = mg(sin22) = 37 N

F(kinetic force) = -0.3(mg) = -29.4

I am not finished but was wondering if someone could at least hint to me as if I am going in the right direction. This has been confusing me for the past hour.

Friction is miu * normal component of weight force.

EDIT: for the rest you are on your own as there is no detail of the set-up
 
Fnet=ma
F(force applied by the crane)-Fr(force of friction)+w(force of gravity on the box)=ma
projection along the direction of motion Wx=mgsin22 and Wx is in the opposite direction of motion so it will have negative value
F-(Uk.m.g)-(mgsin22)=ma
now i think ur missing the force applied by the crane in the givings because
a=(F-29.4-37)/10
so if u have the force applied by the crane u can calculate the acceleration
 
alphali said:
Fnet=ma
F(force applied by the crane)-Fr(force of friction)+w(force of gravity on the box)=ma
projection along the direction of motion Wx=mgsin22 and Wx is in the opposite direction of motion so it will have negative value
F-(Uk.m.g)-(mgsin22)=ma
now i think ur missing the force applied by the crane in the givings because
a=(F-29.4-37)/10
so if u have the force applied by the crane u can calculate the acceleration

Would the crane have applied a force? It isn't given in any of the text. All that is happening is that the board that is being held by the crane is tilting on a 22 degree angle causing the boxes to slide
 
phee said:
Would the crane have applied a force? It isn't given in any of the text. All that is happening is that the board that is being held by the crane is tilting on a 22 degree angle causing the boxes to slide

We need a picture ! ?

You wondered if the crane would apply a force, because it wasn't given in the text.

You are one step ahead of us as we don't even have the text!

EDIT: is the small crane lifting this all up at constant speed?
 
PeterO said:
We need a picture ! ?

You wondered if the crane would apply a force, because it wasn't given in the text.

You are one step ahead of us as we don't even have the text!

EDIT: is the small crane lifting this all up at constant speed?

It only says,

a small crane is raising two boxes of nails on a plank to the roof. I assume its at a constant velocity which means no acceleration from the crane.

The plank then tilts and the boxes begin to slide at a 22 degree angle.

Do I find Fgx then plug it into Fnet = m/a?
 
phee said:
It only says,

a small crane is raising two boxes of nails on a plank to the roof. I assume its at a constant velocity which means no acceleration from the crane.

The plank then tilts and the boxes begin to slide at a 22 degree angle.

Do I find Fgx then plug it into Fnet = m/a?

With the plank at 22 degrees, you can find the component of the weight of a box parallel to, and perpendicular to, the plank.
The perpendicular component [the normal force] will enable you to calculate the Friction force acting.
Presumably the parallel component of weight exceeds this and you can then use F = ma to find the acceleration.
Don't forget that the half empty box has smaller forces involved, but at the last step, a smaller mass.
 
Let me spill what I have so far,

(for the 10kg box)

Fgx = mg(sin22)
Fgx = (10kg)(9.8 ms^2)(sin22)
Fgx = 37 N

Fn = Fgy

Fgy= mg(cos22)
Fgy= (10)(9.8)(cos22)
Fgy= 91 N

*Fn = 91 N*

Fkinetic friction = Ukmg
= (0.3)(10)(9.8)
=29.4 N



So...

Fnet = 91 N - 37 N - 29.4 N
Fnet = 24.6 N


Fnet=ma

a = 10 kg / 24.6 N
a = 0.4 m/s ^2


I hope I got it, I am not 100% sure I should be using Fgy in this equation though.
 
phee said:
Let me spill what I have so far,

(for the 10kg box)

Fgx = mg(sin22)
Fgx = (10kg)(9.8 ms^2)(sin22)
Fgx = 37 N

Fn = Fgy

Fgy= mg(cos22)
Fgy= (10)(9.8)(cos22)
Fgy= 91 N

*Fn = 91 N*

Fkinetic friction = Ukmg
= (0.3)(10)(9.8)
=29.4 N



So...

Fnet = 91 N - 37 N - 29.4 N
Fnet = 24.6 N


Fnet=ma

a = 10 kg / 24.6 N
a = 0.4 m/s ^2


I hope I got it, I am not 100% sure I should be using Fgy in this equation though.


Fkinetic friction = Uk*Fn
= (0.3) * 91
= what ever you get.

Friction force is calculated from the NORMAL force, not the weight.

Then

Fnet = 37 N - (29.4 N)

I left your old 29.4 here - it should be the new value you calculate using the normal force.


The problem could be affected by the crane if the crane was accelerating the plank. In the absence of any indication otherwise, we can assume it is traveling at constant speed - the usual way cranes work
 
  • #10
Fnet = Fgx - Fn
= 37 N - 27.3 N
= 9.7 N

Fnet = ma
9.7 N = (10kg)a
9.7 N /10kg = a
0.97 m/s ^2 = a

Therefore the acceleration of the 10 kg box is 0.97 m/s ^ 2

This is right? And thank you for the help kind sir
 
  • #11
phee said:
Fnet = Fgx - Fn
= 37 N - 27.3 N
= 9.7 N

Fnet = ma
9.7 N = (10kg)a
9.7 N /10kg = a
0.97 m/s ^2 = a

Therefore the acceleration of the 10 kg box is 0.97 m/s ^ 2

This is right? And thank you for the help kind sir

It all looks fine [hoping your sin and cos values were correct, I didn't check them but they look reasonable].
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K