Finding all solutions to non-linear system numericaly

  • Thread starter Thread starter charnley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Non-linear System
AI Thread Summary
Finding all solutions to a system of non-linear equations numerically is challenging without analytical analysis. Numerical methods, like Newton's Method, typically yield one solution based on a chosen starting value, making it difficult to find all roots. Without initial information about potential solutions, it is nearly impossible to identify all roots, especially in cases with infinite solutions. Analytical techniques are necessary to determine the number of roots present in the system. Ultimately, a combination of numerical and analytical methods is essential for comprehensive solution finding.
charnley
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello world,

Is it possible to find all solutions to a system of non-linear equations, without solving them analytically?

I have implemented a python solution of Newton's Method, is there a method of getting good guesses without scanning all numbers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "find all solutions"? You can, of course, approximate solutions. Is that what you mean by "finding" them? All numerical methods of solving equations will give one equation- typically, though not necessarily, the one closest to the chosen "starting value". So to find "all" solutions you would have to have some information about their possible values to begin with. And how would you know if you had found all solutions? What about equations that have an infinite number of solutions?
 
By "find all solutions" I mean finding the roots. Is there a way to, numerically, analyse the functions. If I *don't* have any information about their possible values to begin with, find all possible roots.

Hmm, I actually did no consider a system with infinite number of solutions. Hmm.

So there is no way to find all roots, without doing a analytical analysis of the system?
 
charnley said:
So there is no way to find all roots, without doing a analytical analysis of the system?

Correct. If you don't do some analysis, you don't even know how many roots there are.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top