Finding an interval in which the IVP has a unique solution.

  • Thread starter Thread starter theBEAST
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Ivp
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the question with the solution from the textbook:
8IaP6.png


I don't get how looking at (2/t) and 4t tells us that the solution must be on the interval 0 to infinity. Don't we have to set y' to zero and solve for how the directional fields behave and thus find out how y behaves as t -> infinity?

I don't think I am visualizing this correctly and thus I don't understand how the answer works. Could anyone please explain?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice your initial condition, y(1) = 2, which is positive, yes? This corresponds to your interval of t being strictly positive ( Since if t = 0, then our equation is undefined ).

So 0 < t < ∞
 
Zondrina said:
Notice your initial condition, y(1) = 2, which is positive, yes? This corresponds to your interval of t being strictly positive ( Since if t = 0, then our equation is undefined ).

So 0 < t < ∞

So because of the discontinuity at t = 0, the solution will never be negative if the initial condition is positive?
 
theBEAST said:
So because of the discontinuity at t = 0, the solution will never be negative if the initial condition is positive?

Yes indeed.
 
What about this question? Why is the negative answer from taking the root of y^2 rejected?

X4FUF.png


Is it because y has a discontinuity at 0 and thus because our initial condition y(2) = 3 starts in the positive y the solution must vary between 0 < y < infinity?

I just want to clarify this one because it is slightly different when compared to my original question in that the discontinuity is y instead of t or x.

Thank you!
 
You would want the solution corresponding with the positive initial condition, so yes you ignore the negative case.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top