MHB Finding an unknown 3-digit number

  • Thread starter Thread starter mklilly2000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Multiplying a 3-digit number by 1002 results in the format AB007C, where A, B, and C are digits. The discussion reveals that using the distributive property and testing various 3-digit numbers has not yielded a solution. Analysis shows that for the last digit C to be valid, it must equal 0, leading to a contradiction in the fifth column where 2B must end in 7, which is impossible since 2B is even. Therefore, the conclusion is that this alphametic problem has no solution. The original number cannot be determined under the given conditions.
mklilly2000
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If you multiply a 3-digit number by 1002 and get AB007C, where A, B, and C stand for digits, what is teh original 3-digit number? We've tried using the distributive property as well as just multiplying by 3-digit numbers that give you a 0 in the thousandths place but no luck. Thanks for any suggestions!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, mklilly2000!

This alphametic has no solution.

If you multiply a 3-digit number ABC by 1002 and get AB007C,
what is the original 3-digit number?
Arrange the multiplication like this:

\begin{array}{ccccc}<br /> ^1&amp;^2&amp;^3&amp;^4&amp;^5&amp;^6 \\<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp; A&amp;B&amp;C \\<br /> \times &amp;&amp; 1 &amp; 0&amp; 0 &amp; 2 \\ \hline<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp; 2A &amp; 2B&amp; 2C \\<br /> A&amp;B&amp;C \\ \hline<br /> A&amp;B&amp;0&amp;0&amp;7&amp;C \end{array}

In column-6, we see that 2C ends in C.
Hence, C=0 and there is no "carry" to column-5.

In column-5, we see that 2B ends in 7.
Since 2B is even, this is clearly impossible.

Q.E.D.

 
Soroban, the problem does not say that the original number is ABC.
 
Hint:

The middle digit of the three-digit number is a 3.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top