Finding Area Under Curve with Stochastic Model

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieran1black2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Curve
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the area under an exponential function graph using various methods, including empirical and finite element models. The user is specifically seeking information on stochastic or probability models for this purpose. They emphasize the need for a formula or steps rather than tools like a planimeter. Additional numerical integration methods mentioned include Romberg, adaptive quadrature, and Gauss-Legendre. The inquiry aims to gather resources or guidance on applying the stochastic model for area calculation.
kieran1black2
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have an exponential function graph that was given to me as a question i had to find the points and find three different ways of finding the area under the curve.

I found an Empirical model (finding the formula and integrating from one point to another)

I found a Finite Element model (either using simpson's rule or the trapezoidal rule)

But there seems to be another one called a Stochastic model or probability model.

My question is is there anyone that knows where to find this on the net or knows of it right off the back? I would like to know just the rule or steps and i will do the work myself... thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get some device called a planimeter that is (was) used to determine the area under a graph, or the area of any flat surface.
 
but that has nothing to do with the stochastic model or probability model...

i need a formula or set of steps not a tool...
 
Other numerical integration methods are Rhomberg, adaptive quadrature and Gauss-Legendre.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top