Finding coeficient of friction with a slope/blocks/a pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter DLH112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction (µk) for two blocks connected by a string over a pulley on an incline. The blocks are moving with a velocity of 5.7 m/s and an acceleration of 4 m/s², but there is confusion regarding the interpretation of the problem, particularly the terms "constant velocity" and "acceleration." The normal force calculation is debated, with suggestions to use free body diagrams to clarify the forces acting on each block. It is emphasized that the weight of the block must be resolved into components to accurately determine the normal force, which should be equal to the perpendicular component of the weight. Correctly applying Newton's laws and understanding the geometry of the incline are crucial for solving the problem.
DLH112
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks are connected by a thin inextensible string over a frictionless massless pulley
as shown on the picture below
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s
Given that the two blocks move at 5.7 m/s
under an acceleration of 4 m/s^2
calculate the coefficient µk of kinetic friction between the
left block and the incline.

The picture is a slope of 23 degrees

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma and friction = Fn(mu)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the normal force to be 284.2/cos(23) = 308.7436 N.
the problem says that its moving at a constant velocity so the net force should equal 0.
m x a = 92 x 4 = 368 N though which would make mu = 368/308.7436 aka greater than 1 which is wrong.
Maybe I misunderstood something in the wording of the problem? :/
 

Attachments

  • physics help plz.png
    physics help plz.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 717
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not clearly worded. It can't be moving at constant velocity if it is accelerating at 4m/s/s. I guess it means that at some point in time its velocity is 5.7 m/s, but that is irelevant here.

Check your normal force calculation, you divided when you should have multiplied.

It is essential that you draw free body diagrams of each block to identify the forces acting on each block, then use Newton's laws on each to solve for the friction coefficient from the resulting 2 equations. Don't try to do it in one fell swoop.
 
are you absolutely sure my normal force calculation should be multiplied instead of divided? I can't see how.
The 23 degree angle should be the same as the angle from Fg(vertical) to -Fnormal(perpendicular to the incline) of the block on the incline.
then cos x = adj/hyp
cos 23 = 284.2/h
h cos 23 = 284.2
h = 284.2/cos 23

the other things you said are very useful though :) thanks.
 
DLH112 said:
are you absolutely sure my normal force calculation should be multiplied instead of divided? I can't see how.
you have mixed up the weight with the normal force , while also mixing up the hypotenuse and adjacent side
The 23 degree angle should be the same as the angle from Fg(vertical) to -Fnormal(perpendicular to the incline) of the block on the incline.
Yes, this is corrrect
then cos x = adj/hyp
cos 23 = 284.2/h
h cos 23 = 284.2
h = 284.2/cos 23
The weight acts straight down. You should then break up the weight into its components perpendicular and parallel to the incline. The components can never be greater than the resultant weight. The weight is the hypotenuse. The component of the weight perpendicular to the incline is the adjacent side and thus equal to h(cos23) = (284.2)cos 23. Then since there is no acceleration perpendicular to the incline, the Normal force must be equal to the perpendicular component of the weight, per Newton's First Law.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top