Finding Constant Acceleration of Train: Liz's Homework Solution

AI Thread Summary
To find the constant acceleration of the train, Liz calculated the velocity of each car based on their lengths and the time taken to pass. She used the equation change in velocity = a(t) but arrived at an acceleration of 0.8 m/s², which differs from the book's answer of 1.6 m/s². A participant pointed out that using v = s/t only applies to constant velocity, suggesting Liz derive two equations for acceleration and initial velocity to eliminate the initial velocity and solve for acceleration. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying physics equations in kinematics. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between velocity, time, and acceleration is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
atypical
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Liz rushes down onto a subway platform to find her train already
departing. She stops and watches the cars go by. Each
car is 8.60 m long. The first moves past her in 1.50 s and the
second in 1.10 s. Find the constant acceleration of the train.


Homework Equations


change in velocity=a(t)


The Attempt at a Solution


My answer is different from the book. I found the velocity of each cart given the length and time to pass. From there I took the difference of the two velocities to get my change in velocity.
Then, from the equation i found the total time from both cars to pass then divided to solve for a.

change in velocity=a(t)
therefore: 2.11m/s=a(1.5s+1.1s)
a=0.8m/s^2
Book is getting 1.6m/s^2
...so I am off by a product of 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi atypical! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
atypical said:
I found the velocity of each cart given the length and time to pass.

nooo … v = s/t only works for constant velocity …

call the initial velocity v, and get two equations for a and v, from which you can eliminate v to find a :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top