Finding current and voltage amplification via load line graph plotting

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating current and voltage amplification in a common emitter transistor configuration, using load line graph plotting. Participants explore the relationships between base current, collector current, and voltage, while addressing specific values and assumptions related to the circuit parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a load line equation for the transistor configuration: Ic = -Vce / 2k + 4m.
  • Current amplification is calculated as Ai = 1.25m / 40u = 31.25, based on chosen quiescent operating point.
  • Voltage amplification is derived using the formula Av = (Iout)(Rload) / (Iin)(Rinput), resulting in Av = 41.667.
  • Another participant questions whether the base current (Ib) varies from the quiescent point to produce changes in collector current (Ic), suggesting a signal superimposed upon the quiescent operating point.
  • There is a discussion about the input and output resistances being given values of 1.5k Ω and 2k Ω, respectively.
  • Clarification is sought regarding a potential typo in the table of Ib values, with one participant suggesting that 68 μA should actually be 60 μA.
  • One participant acknowledges a typo regarding the base current and mentions that the question states the Ib swing at a peak-to-peak value of 40 μA.
  • Participants confirm that the calculations appear to be correct after addressing the typo.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the calculations presented, but there is some uncertainty regarding the variation of base current and the accuracy of the data table. The discussion includes multiple viewpoints on how to interpret the base current's role in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions made regarding the quiescent operating point and the variation of base current during operation. The accuracy of the data table is also in question, particularly regarding the values of Ib.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is a question refer to a transistor in a common emitter configuration.

And this is the table with data of Vce and Ic at certain range of Ib stored in microsoft excel, and the graph is plotted within the file attached(in another tab)
https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6a6b8f595e70a970a0

The question also stated load resistance is 2k Ω

The base current is suppose to be in micro Amp, forgot to include this in the data table..

The Attempt at a Solution



no other pictorial information about how circuit, so i suppose this common emitter, have a load resistance of 2k Ω before collector and a Base resistor

so i come out with my load line equation,

Ic = -Vce / 2k + 4m
I induced this load line in my attachment,

So let's say i choose my quiscent operating point at
Ib = 40 uA, and my output current and voltage peak to peak is :

Vpp = 5.8 - 3.1 = 2.7V
Ipp = 2.45 - 1.2 = 1.25 m A

so my current amplification is
Ai = 1.25m / 40u = 31.25



and if the input resistance is 1.5k Ω,



my voltage amplification is,

Av = (Iout)(Rload) / (Iin)(Rinput)
=Ai x (Rload)/(Rinput)
= 31.25(2/1.5)
= 41.667
 
Physics news on Phys.org
null void said:

Homework Statement


This is a question refer to a transistor in a common emitter configuration.

And this is the table with data of Vce and Ic at certain range of Ib stored in microsoft excel, and the graph is plotted within the file attached(in another tab)
https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6a6b8f595e70a970a0

The question also stated load resistance is 2k Ω

The base current is suppose to be in micro Amp, forgot to include this in the data table..

The Attempt at a Solution



no other pictorial information about how circuit, so i suppose this common emitter, have a load resistance of 2k Ω before collector and a Base resistor

so i come out with my load line equation,

Ic = -Vce / 2k + 4m
I induced this load line in my attachment,

So let's say i choose my quiscent operating point at
Ib = 40 uA, and my output current and voltage peak to peak is :

Vpp = 5.8 - 3.1 = 2.7V
Ipp = 2.45 - 1.2 = 1.25 m A

so my current amplification is
Ai = 1.25m / 40u = 31.25
Isn't your Ib varying from the quiescent point to produce the change in Ic (A signal superimposed upon the quiescent operating point)?
and if the input resistance is 1.5k Ω,
Presumably this is a given value?
my voltage amplification is,

Av = (Iout)(Rload) / (Iin)(Rinput)
=Ai x (Rload)/(Rinput)
= 31.25(2/1.5)
= 41.667
 
Isn't your Ib varying from the quiescent point to produce the change in Ic (A signal superimposed upon the quiescent operating point)?

yes

And the given value is the output resistance(2k ohms), input resistance(1.5k ohms)
And a table of Ic and Vce value at different Ib(20u, 40u, 60u, 80).

In the attachment file i posted in the my first post, the right most column is the value i compute with
Ic = -Vce / 2k + 4m, is not actually the value given in the question.
 
null void said:
yes
So shouldn't the actual ΔIb be used to calculate the current gain rather than the fixed quiescent current?
And the given value is the output resistance(2k ohms), input resistance(1.5k ohms)
And a table of Ic and Vce value at different Ib(20u, 40u, 60u, 80).

In the attachment file i posted in the my first post, the right most column is the value i compute with
Ic = -Vce / 2k + 4m, is not actually the value given in the question.

Okay. But your table claims 68 μA for one of the Ib values... Is that a typo? should it in fact be 60 μA? If it is, it would explain your use of 40 μA in the current gain calculation.
 
yeah my bad, it is 60u...my typo, and the question also stated the Ib swing at peak to peak value of 40u, forgot to include this.

Vcc = 8v
 
null void said:
yeah my bad, it is 60u...my typo, and the question also stated the Ib swing at peak to peak value of 40u, forgot to include this.

Vcc = 8v
Okay. So then it looks like your calculations are fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K